Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study I-RES-101 in-depth review

Gentamicin found in one in five Egyptian chicken samples, mostly in liver

Assessment of antibiotic residues in chicken meat.

Overview

Kamouh HM et al.. Open Vet J 2024 · PMID 38633178 · DOI 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.40

21% of samples contained gentamicin, most often liver and gizzard; boiling removed over 90%.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

How often are oxytetracycline, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin residues present in retail chicken in Egypt, and does boiling reduce them?

How was the study done?

Cross-sectional residue survey (microbial inhibition test plus HPLC) with a boiling experiment

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

100 samples (25 per tissue)

What was actually found?

Positive: oxytetracycline 23%, gentamicin 21%, ciprofloxacin 17% of samples. Gentamicin by tissue: breast 16%, thigh 16%, gizzard 20%, liver 32%; mean concentrations (ng/g) 31.8, 52.5, 201.3, 243.2 (max liver 378.5). Above the MRL used: breast 1/25, thigh 2/25, gizzard 4/25, liver 5/25. Boiling 30 min reduced gentamicin by 91.8-95.2% (liver 378.5 -> 18.3 ng/g), oxytetracycline by 88.2% and ciprofloxacin by 23-31%.

How large was the observed effect?

Positive: oxytetracycline 23%, gentamicin 21%, ciprofloxacin 17% of samples. Gentamicin by tissue: breast 16%, thigh 16%, gizzard 20%, liver 32%; mean concentrations (ng/g) 31.8, 52.5, 201.3, 243.2 (max liver 378.5). Above the MRL used: breast 1/25, thigh 2/25, gizzard 4/25, liver 5/25. Boiling 30 min reduced gentamicin by 91.8-95.2% (liver 378.5 -> 18.3 ng/g), oxytetracycline by 88.2% and ciprofloxacin by 23-31%.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Antibiotic traces are real in Egyptian chicken, especially in offal; cooking removes most gentamicin; the amounts are tiny compared with medical doses.

What are the study's limitations?

Small sample from one governorate; Gentamicin MRLs taken from EU bovine/porcine values (EU 37/2010 lists gentamicin MRLs only for bovine and porcine species, I-RES-01); Inconsistent counts (21 MIT-positive vs 25 positive in Table 7 text); No dietary risk assessment

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports that gentamicin is used in Egyptian broilers; does not support kidney or hearing damage.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Not applicable to EU production.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show any health effect.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Kamouh HM et al.
Journal
Open Vet J
Year
2024
Identifier
PMID 38633178 DOI 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.40
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
full text
Conflicts of interest and funding

No external funding; authors declare no conflict of interest (full text)

2. Research question

How often are oxytetracycline, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin residues present in retail chicken in Egypt, and does boiling reduce them?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Measurement / residue study – Cross-sectional residue survey (microbial inhibition test plus HPLC) with a boiling experiment
Population

Chicken breast, thigh, gizzard and liver from slaughterhouses in Kafr El-Sheikh markets

Country

Egypt

Period

not stated (received Oct 2023)

Sample size

100 samples (25 per tissue)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

as described in the abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Antibiotic use in broilers (residues)

Comparator

MRLs (EU 2010 values as cited by authors)

Endpoints

Detection rates, concentrations, MRL exceedance, reduction by boiling

Statistical methods

as reported in the abstract

5. Actual results

Results

Positive: oxytetracycline 23%, gentamicin 21%, ciprofloxacin 17% of samples. Gentamicin by tissue: breast 16%, thigh 16%, gizzard 20%, liver 32%; mean concentrations (ng/g) 31.8, 52.5, 201.3, 243.2 (max liver 378.5). Above the MRL used: breast 1/25, thigh 2/25, gizzard 4/25, liver 5/25. Boiling 30 min reduced gentamicin by 91.8-95.2% (liver 378.5 -> 18.3 ng/g), oxytetracycline by 88.2% and ciprofloxacin by 23-31%.

Absolute risks

Worst-case 100 g raw liver portion about 38 ug gentamicin = 3.2% of ADI (reviewer calculation)

Authors' conclusion

Antimicrobial residues were detected in chicken meat parts retailed in Egypt; cooking can reduce them at least in part.

6. Strengths

  • Confirmatory HPLC
  • Tissue-specific data
  • Cooking experiment
  • Full text read (methods, results, funding)

7. Weaknesses

  • Small sample from one governorate
  • Gentamicin MRLs taken from EU bovine/porcine values (EU 37/2010 lists gentamicin MRLs only for bovine and porcine species, I-RES-01)
  • Inconsistent counts (21 MIT-positive vs 25 positive in Table 7 text)
  • No dietary risk assessment

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Convenience sample; reporting inconsistencies.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Worst-case intake from a 100 g portion of the most contaminated raw liver = 3.2% of the JECFA ADI; 0.15% after boiling (stats/C-RES-03_gentamicin_exposure.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Only located study measuring gentamicin residues in Egyptian chicken.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

13. Overall methodological judgement

21% of samples contained gentamicin, most often liver and gizzard; boiling removed over 90%.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitynot replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitylow
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks