Potentially false Certainty of evidence: very low provisional C-RES-03

Poultry farms inject chicks with gentamicin; consumers then ingest gentamicin with chicken liver, gizzards and meat, which damages kidneys and hearing.

Conclusion: Practice unverified; harm from food residues not supported.

Original statement

المزارع الفراخ اللي ما بتعرفش ربنا بيحقن الفرخه وهي صغننه كده حقنه جينتامايس

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

Poultry farms inject chicks with gentamicin; consumers then ingest gentamicin with chicken liver, gizzards and meat, which damages kidneys and hearing.

Origin

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الموت المفاجيء (Open source)
Published
14 July 2025
Timestamp
0:26:27 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Elawady relays what a patient who owns a poultry farm told him; machine transcript.
Claimed mechanism

Aminoglycoside residues cause nephro- and ototoxicity in consumers.

Claimed health effect

Kidney damage, hearing loss.

Population concerned

Consumers of chicken (Egypt)

Geographic restriction by Elawady

Refers to farms 'that do not fear God' (some farms), apparently in Egypt.

Diverging source versions

انت بقى بتبلبع الجنتامايسين ده في الكبد والقوانص وفي لحمتها

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الموت المفاجيء (Open source)
Published
14 July 2025
Timestamp
0:27:34 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps; 'published' is the date listed by the archive. Passage read in context.

Scientific assessment

Potentially false – The available evidence tends to speak against the statement, but is not conclusive.

Certainty of evidence: very low – Any assessment is very uncertain.

1. What was claimed?

Gentamicin injections in chicks lead to toxic residues in chicken.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

Antibiotic misuse and residues in Egyptian broilers are documented for other antibiotics: enrofloxacin, oxytetracycline and sulfadimidine residues in 52%, 72% and 17% of retail samples, many above MRLs, highest in liver (I-RES-08). That study did not analyse gentamicin.

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

Kidney and ear damage from gentamicin is known from therapeutic injections; no evidence was found that residue levels in food cause such effects. Even for the antibiotics found above MRLs in Egyptian chicken, hazard quotients were far below 1 (I-RES-08).

4. What remains unclear?

Whether and how often day-old chicks are injected with gentamicin in Egypt; residue levels at slaughter after a 30-45 day growth period.

5. Which studies support it?

None for gentamicin. I-RES-08 shows only that residue problems exist for other antibiotics in Egyptian chicken (gentamicin not analysed; no kidney or hearing outcomes).

6. Which studies contradict it?

Indirect: I-RES-08 (hazard quotients far below 1 for the antibiotics measured).

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

Residue limits and monitoring apply (I-RES-01, I-RES-07).

8. What is known about Egypt?

Monitoring and withdrawal-period enforcement needed (I-RES-08).

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

Antibiotic residues in Egyptian poultry are a real regulatory concern, but the claimed kidney/ear damage in consumers is not supported.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

No verified data were found on gentamicin use in Egyptian hatcheries or on gentamicin residues in Egyptian chicken. The toxicity claim transfers effects of therapeutic doses (injected, high) to food residues (oral, trace). Aminoglycosides are poorly absorbed from the gut (general pharmacology; no source fetched in this review).

Source quality

Anecdote relayed from one patient.

Regional transferability

Egypt-specific; EU: in the original 2010 Annex of Reg. 37/2010, gentamicin MRLs were listed only for bovine and porcine species (I-RES-01).

Regional scope of the claim
refers to Egypt
Last reviewed
25 October 2026 provisional

In plain language

Dr Elawady says some poultry farms inject chicks with the antibiotic gentamicin and that people then eat it and damage their kidneys and hearing. No data on gentamicin in Egyptian chicken were found. Other antibiotics have been found in Egyptian chicken, sometimes above legal limits, but the estimated intake was far below levels considered harmful. The kidney and hearing damage he describes is known from medical injections, not from food traces.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (0)

No studies in this group.

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (0)

No studies in this group.

Studies with mixed or unclear results (2)

  • EU limits for veterinary drug residues

    European Commission. Official Journal of the EU 2010
    Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    The EU sets residue limits (e.g. emamectin 100 µg/kg in fish) and bans some drugs such as chloramphenicol and nitrofurans.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Set MRLs.

    How was the study done?

    Regulation.

    What was actually found?

    MRLs and prohibitions.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Residues are legally limited.

    What are the study's limitations?

    As-adopted text.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Context.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High.

    Scientific details →

  • Antibiotic residues in Egyptian chicken

    Noah SM et al.. Sci Rep 2026 · PMID 42527435 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-63227-2
    Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study

    Most chicken samples had antibiotic residues, often above legal limits, but estimated intake was far below harmful levels.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Measure residues.

    How was the study done?

    HPLC.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    180 chicken samples (breast, thigh, liver) from shops in Mit Ghamr, Egypt.

    What was actually found?

    Oxytetracycline in 72%, enrofloxacin in 52%, sulfadimidine in 17%; more than half of positives above legal limits; liver highest; hazard quotients at most 0.05.

    How large was the observed effect?

    HQ <= 0.05.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Regulation problem, low direct risk.

    What are the study's limitations?

    One town; no confirmatory mass-spectrometry; simple intake assumptions; gentamicin not tested.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Partly supports residue concern; not harm.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Low.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Resistance effects; health harm; anything about gentamicin.

    Scientific details →

Regional context

Germany / EU

Residue limits and monitoring apply (I-RES-01, I-RES-07).

Egypt

Monitoring and withdrawal-period enforcement needed (I-RES-08).

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

Potentially false Practice unverified; harm from food residues not supported.

The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:

  • Pesticides and pesticide residues
  • Veterinary medicines and antibiotics
  • Hormonal growth promoters
  • Contaminants (heavy metals, PFAS, PCBs, dioxins, nitrate)
  • Pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, etc.)
  • Animal husbandry and feed
  • Controls, imports, recalls, labelling

Eggs · Poultry · Dairy · Fish and seafood · Red meat · Fruit and vegetables

Choose a country to see the checked information for it.

Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.

Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country

References

  1. Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin. European Commission. Official Journal of the EU 2010
  2. Health risk assessment of enrofloxacin, oxytetracycline, and sulfadimidine residues in broiler chicken carcasses marketed in Mit Ghamr, Egypt.. Noah SM et al.. Sci Rep 2026 · PMID 42527435 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-63227-2

← Back to overview