Poultry farms inject chicks with gentamicin; consumers then ingest gentamicin with chicken liver, gizzards and meat, which damages kidneys and hearing.
Original statement
المزارع الفراخ اللي ما بتعرفش ربنا بيحقن الفرخه وهي صغننه كده حقنه جينتامايس
verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.
Translation
Poultry farms inject chicks with gentamicin; consumers then ingest gentamicin with chicken liver, gizzards and meat, which damages kidneys and hearing.
Origin
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الموت المفاجيء (Open source)
- Published
- 14 July 2025
- Timestamp
- 0:26:27 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Elawady relays what a patient who owns a poultry farm told him; machine transcript.
- Claimed mechanism
Aminoglycoside residues cause nephro- and ototoxicity in consumers.
- Claimed health effect
Kidney damage, hearing loss.
- Population concerned
Consumers of chicken (Egypt)
- Geographic restriction by Elawady
Refers to farms 'that do not fear God' (some farms), apparently in Egypt.
Diverging source versions
انت بقى بتبلبع الجنتامايسين ده في الكبد والقوانص وفي لحمتها
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الموت المفاجيء (Open source)
- Published
- 14 July 2025
- Timestamp
- 0:27:34 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps; 'published' is the date listed by the archive. Passage read in context.
Scientific assessment
Potentially false – The available evidence tends to speak against the statement, but is not conclusive.
Certainty of evidence: very low – Any assessment is very uncertain.
1. What was claimed?
Gentamicin injections in chicks lead to toxic residues in chicken.
2. What is demonstrably correct?
Antibiotic misuse and residues in Egyptian broilers are documented for other antibiotics: enrofloxacin, oxytetracycline and sulfadimidine residues in 52%, 72% and 17% of retail samples, many above MRLs, highest in liver (I-RES-08). That study did not analyse gentamicin.
3. What is wrong or exaggerated?
Kidney and ear damage from gentamicin is known from therapeutic injections; no evidence was found that residue levels in food cause such effects. Even for the antibiotics found above MRLs in Egyptian chicken, hazard quotients were far below 1 (I-RES-08).
4. What remains unclear?
Whether and how often day-old chicks are injected with gentamicin in Egypt; residue levels at slaughter after a 30-45 day growth period.
5. Which studies support it?
None for gentamicin. I-RES-08 shows only that residue problems exist for other antibiotics in Egyptian chicken (gentamicin not analysed; no kidney or hearing outcomes).
6. Which studies contradict it?
Indirect: I-RES-08 (hazard quotients far below 1 for the antibiotics measured).
7. What applies to Germany and Europe?
Residue limits and monitoring apply (I-RES-01, I-RES-07).
8. What is known about Egypt?
Monitoring and withdrawal-period enforcement needed (I-RES-08).
9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?
Antibiotic residues in Egyptian poultry are a real regulatory concern, but the claimed kidney/ear damage in consumers is not supported.
Assessment details
- Rationale for certainty of evidence
No verified data were found on gentamicin use in Egyptian hatcheries or on gentamicin residues in Egyptian chicken. The toxicity claim transfers effects of therapeutic doses (injected, high) to food residues (oral, trace). Aminoglycosides are poorly absorbed from the gut (general pharmacology; no source fetched in this review).
- Source quality
Anecdote relayed from one patient.
- Regional transferability
Egypt-specific; EU: in the original 2010 Annex of Reg. 37/2010, gentamicin MRLs were listed only for bovine and porcine species (I-RES-01).
- Regional scope of the claim
- refers to Egypt
- Last reviewed
- 25 October 2026 provisional
In plain language
Dr Elawady says some poultry farms inject chicks with the antibiotic gentamicin and that people then eat it and damage their kidneys and hearing. No data on gentamicin in Egyptian chicken were found. Other antibiotics have been found in Egyptian chicken, sometimes above legal limits, but the estimated intake was far below levels considered harmful. The kidney and hearing damage he describes is known from medical injections, not from food traces.
Studies on this claim
Studies supporting the claim (0)
No studies in this group.
Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (0)
No studies in this group.
Studies with mixed or unclear results (2)
-
EU limits for veterinary drug residues
European Commission. Official Journal of the EU 2010Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checkedThe EU sets residue limits (e.g. emamectin 100 µg/kg in fish) and bans some drugs such as chloramphenicol and nitrofurans.
Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Set MRLs.
- How was the study done?
Regulation.
- What was actually found?
MRLs and prohibitions.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Residues are legally limited.
- What are the study's limitations?
As-adopted text.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Context.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
High.
-
Antibiotic residues in Egyptian chicken
Noah SM et al.. Sci Rep 2026 · PMID 42527435 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-63227-2Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key studyMost chicken samples had antibiotic residues, often above legal limits, but estimated intake was far below harmful levels.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Measure residues.
- How was the study done?
HPLC.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
180 chicken samples (breast, thigh, liver) from shops in Mit Ghamr, Egypt.
- What was actually found?
Oxytetracycline in 72%, enrofloxacin in 52%, sulfadimidine in 17%; more than half of positives above legal limits; liver highest; hazard quotients at most 0.05.
- How large was the observed effect?
HQ <= 0.05.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Regulation problem, low direct risk.
- What are the study's limitations?
One town; no confirmatory mass-spectrometry; simple intake assumptions; gentamicin not tested.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Partly supports residue concern; not harm.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Low.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Resistance effects; health harm; anything about gentamicin.
No study in this group is marked as key.
Regional context
Germany / EU
Residue limits and monitoring apply (I-RES-01, I-RES-07).
Egypt
Monitoring and withdrawal-period enforcement needed (I-RES-08).
- Food-safety governance and official controls
- Pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables on the EU/German market (incl. imports from Egypt)
- Pesticide residues in produce sold on the Egyptian domestic market
- Antibiotic (veterinary drug) residues in poultry meat and eggs
- Antimicrobial use in food animals and antibiotic growth promoters
- Hormones in poultry, meat, milk and farmed fish
- Salmonella in laying hens, eggs and broiler chicken
- Dioxins, PCBs and PFAS in eggs and other animal foods
- Aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products
- Aflatoxins in groundnuts (peanuts)
- Heavy metals in fish
- Farmed fish (aquaculture): drugs, water source and controls
- Import controls and the meaning of RASFF notifications for Egyptian products
What applies in my country?
General scientific assessment
Potentially false Practice unverified; harm from food residues not supported.
The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:
- Pesticides and pesticide residues
- Veterinary medicines and antibiotics
- Hormonal growth promoters
- Contaminants (heavy metals, PFAS, PCBs, dioxins, nitrate)
- Pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, etc.)
- Animal husbandry and feed
- Controls, imports, recalls, labelling
Eggs · Poultry · Dairy · Fish and seafood · Red meat · Fruit and vegetables
Choose a country to see the checked information for it.
Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.
Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country
References
- Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin. European Commission. Official Journal of the EU 2010
- Health risk assessment of enrofloxacin, oxytetracycline, and sulfadimidine residues in broiler chicken carcasses marketed in Mit Ghamr, Egypt.. Noah SM et al.. Sci Rep 2026 · PMID 42527435 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-63227-2