Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-RES-112 standard review

Antibiotic growth promoters improve feed efficiency by only about 3%

Effect of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) on feed conversion ratio (FCR) of broiler chickens: A meta-analysis.

Overview

El-Fateh M et al.. Poult Sci 2024 · PMID 39504822 · DOI 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104472

On average, antibiotics improved feed conversion by 2.8%, with large variation.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

What is the overall effect of AGP on FCR in broilers?

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis with meta-regression (PRISMA)

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

42 articles, 74 experiments, 19,562 chickens

What was actually found?

Overall FCR improvement 2.8% (95% CI 1.3-4.3%; prediction interval -10 to 16%). Breed, dose and location explained 53% of variation.

How large was the observed effect?

Overall FCR improvement 2.8% (95% CI 1.3-4.3%; prediction interval -10 to 16%). Breed, dose and location explained 53% of variation.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Antibiotics are a minor factor in how fast chickens grow today.

What are the study's limitations?

Heterogeneous studies; FCR only

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports use for growth; limits its importance.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

EU: banned.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Does not measure residues or human effects.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
El-Fateh M et al.
Journal
Poult Sci
Year
2024
Identifier
PMID 39504822 DOI 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104472
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

What is the overall effect of AGP on FCR in broilers?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Meta-analysis with meta-regression (PRISMA)
Population

Broilers in 74 experiments

Country

multinational

Period

literature to 2024

Sample size

42 articles, 74 experiments, 19,562 chickens

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

as described in the abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

AGP supplementation

Comparator

Diets without antibiotics

Endpoints

Feed conversion ratio

Statistical methods

as reported in the abstract

5. Actual results

Results

Overall FCR improvement 2.8% (95% CI 1.3-4.3%; prediction interval -10 to 16%). Breed, dose and location explained 53% of variation.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

An overall marginal improvement with wide variation; the authors recommend against using AGP.

6. Strengths

  • Prediction interval reported
  • Meta-regression

7. Weaknesses

  • Heterogeneous studies
  • FCR only

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Abstract only.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Average effect small; prediction interval includes harm and benefit (stats/C-RES-05_agp.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Quantifies the size of the growth-promoting effect.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

13. Overall methodological judgement

On average, antibiotics improved feed conversion by 2.8%, with large variation.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks