Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-SOD-106 in-depth review
High-dose saccharin did not change gut bacteria or blood sugar
High-dose saccharin supplementation does not induce gut microbiota changes or glucose intolerance in healthy humans and mice.
Overview
Serrano J et al.. Microbiome 2021 · PMID 33431052 · DOI 10.1186/s40168-020-00976-w
In a placebo-controlled trial, two weeks of saccharin at the maximum acceptable dose changed neither gut bacteria nor glucose tolerance.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Test whether saccharin harms gut bacteria and glucose control.
- How was the study done?
Double-blind randomised trial in humans plus mouse experiments.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
Healthy adults; mice.
- What was actually found?
No changes in gut bacteria or glucose tolerance.
- How large was the observed effect?
No significant differences.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Effects seen in mice in 2014 were not confirmed for saccharin in this trial.
- What are the study's limitations?
Short trial; capsules.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts the claim for saccharin.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applicable.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Cannot rule out effects in some individuals or over years.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Serrano J et al.
- Journal
- Microbiome
- Year
- 2021
- Identifier
- PMID 33431052 DOI 10.1186/s40168-020-00976-w
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
NIH (NIDDK, NIAID) grants; authors declare no competing interests (PubMed record)
2. Research question
Does pure saccharin at the maximum acceptable daily intake alter gut microbiota or glucose tolerance?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Randomised controlled trial – Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm RCT in humans (2 weeks) plus 10-week mouse study; NCT03032640
- Population
Healthy men and women; chow-fed wild-type and sweet-receptor knockout mice
- Country
USA
- Period
Registered 2017
- Sample size
Not stated in abstract (four human arms)
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Healthy adults; details in full text
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Saccharin capsules twice daily at maximum ADI; lactisole; saccharin plus lactisole
- Comparator
Placebo
- Endpoints
OGTT glucose and hormones; microbiome diversity and composition; faecal metabolites; SCFA
- Statistical methods
Between-arm comparisons
5. Actual results
- Results
In humans and mice, no intervention affected glucose or hormonal responses to an OGTT. Pure saccharin did not alter microbial diversity or composition at any taxonomic level; no effects on faecal metabolites or SCFA.
- Absolute risks
not applicable
- Authors' conclusion
Short-term saccharin consumption at maximum acceptable levels is not sufficient to alter gut microbiota or induce glucose intolerance in apparently healthy humans and mice.
6. Strengths
- Double-blind placebo-controlled
- Maximum ADI dose
- Human and mouse arms
7. Weaknesses
- Two weeks only
- Capsules rather than beverages
- Small sample (not stated in abstract)
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- RoB 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- low
- Rationale
Abstract-level judgement; registered, blinded.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Null result in a small trial cannot exclude person-specific effects as described by Suez 2022 (I-SOD-03).
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Directly contradicts C-SOD-07 for saccharin: no microbiome change and no glucose intolerance.
11. Independent contrary findings
Suez 2022 (I-SOD-03): saccharin and sucralose impaired glycaemic responses in a 120-person RCT.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Applicable.
13. Overall methodological judgement
High-quality null trial that conflicts with Suez 2014/2022; human evidence is inconsistent.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | high |
| Risk of bias | low |
| Precision of results | low |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | not replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | inconsistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Reasons for discordance (vehicle, baseline microbiome, dose form).
15. Linked fact checks
- Artificial sweeteners disturb the beneficial gut bacteria and thereby induce glucose intolerance in animals and humans. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim