Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-SOD-106 in-depth review

High-dose saccharin did not change gut bacteria or blood sugar

High-dose saccharin supplementation does not induce gut microbiota changes or glucose intolerance in healthy humans and mice.

Overview

Serrano J et al.. Microbiome 2021 · PMID 33431052 · DOI 10.1186/s40168-020-00976-w

In a placebo-controlled trial, two weeks of saccharin at the maximum acceptable dose changed neither gut bacteria nor glucose tolerance.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test whether saccharin harms gut bacteria and glucose control.

How was the study done?

Double-blind randomised trial in humans plus mouse experiments.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Healthy adults; mice.

What was actually found?

No changes in gut bacteria or glucose tolerance.

How large was the observed effect?

No significant differences.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Effects seen in mice in 2014 were not confirmed for saccharin in this trial.

What are the study's limitations?

Short trial; capsules.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts the claim for saccharin.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot rule out effects in some individuals or over years.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Serrano J et al.
Journal
Microbiome
Year
2021
Identifier
PMID 33431052 DOI 10.1186/s40168-020-00976-w
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

NIH (NIDDK, NIAID) grants; authors declare no competing interests (PubMed record)

2. Research question

Does pure saccharin at the maximum acceptable daily intake alter gut microbiota or glucose tolerance?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm RCT in humans (2 weeks) plus 10-week mouse study; NCT03032640
Population

Healthy men and women; chow-fed wild-type and sweet-receptor knockout mice

Country

USA

Period

Registered 2017

Sample size

Not stated in abstract (four human arms)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Healthy adults; details in full text

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Saccharin capsules twice daily at maximum ADI; lactisole; saccharin plus lactisole

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoints

OGTT glucose and hormones; microbiome diversity and composition; faecal metabolites; SCFA

Statistical methods

Between-arm comparisons

5. Actual results

Results

In humans and mice, no intervention affected glucose or hormonal responses to an OGTT. Pure saccharin did not alter microbial diversity or composition at any taxonomic level; no effects on faecal metabolites or SCFA.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Short-term saccharin consumption at maximum acceptable levels is not sufficient to alter gut microbiota or induce glucose intolerance in apparently healthy humans and mice.

6. Strengths

  • Double-blind placebo-controlled
  • Maximum ADI dose
  • Human and mouse arms

7. Weaknesses

  • Two weeks only
  • Capsules rather than beverages
  • Small sample (not stated in abstract)

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low
Rationale

Abstract-level judgement; registered, blinded.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Null result in a small trial cannot exclude person-specific effects as described by Suez 2022 (I-SOD-03).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Directly contradicts C-SOD-07 for saccharin: no microbiome change and no glucose intolerance.

11. Independent contrary findings

Suez 2022 (I-SOD-03): saccharin and sucralose impaired glycaemic responses in a 120-person RCT.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

High-quality null trial that conflicts with Suez 2014/2022; human evidence is inconsistent.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitynot replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceinconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Reasons for discordance (vehicle, baseline microbiome, dose form).

15. Linked fact checks