Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-SOD-125 in-depth review
Soft drinks linked to slightly more kidney disease
Sweetened Beverage Intake and Incident Chronic Kidney Disease in the UK Biobank Study.
Overview
Heo GY et al.. JAMA Netw Open 2024 · PMID 38416492 · DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56885
Among 127,830 UK adults, drinking more than one sugary or diet soft drink a day was linked to 19-26% higher risk of chronic kidney disease.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Examine sweetened drinks and kidney disease.
- How was the study done?
UK Biobank cohort over about 10 years.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
127,830 adults; 4459 CKD cases.
- What was actually found?
Sugary and diet drinks linked to more CKD; juice not.
- How large was the observed effect?
HR 1.19 (SSB), 1.26 (ASB).
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Replacing soft drinks with water may be good for kidneys.
- What are the study's limitations?
Observational; not cola-specific.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Supports a modest link; does not prove damage.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
UK data.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Cannot prove causation.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Heo GY et al.
- Journal
- JAMA Netw Open
- Year
- 2024
- Identifier
- PMID 38416492 DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56885
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
Not stated in abstract record
2. Research question
Are SSB, ASB and natural juice associated with incident CKD?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Cohort study – Prospective population-based cohort with substitution analysis
- Population
UK Biobank participants without CKD
- Country
United Kingdom
- Period
Median follow-up 10.5 years
- Sample size
127,830; 4459 incident CKD (3.5%)
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
No CKD history; at least one dietary questionnaire
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
SSB, ASB, natural juice servings/day
- Comparator
Non-consumers
- Endpoints
Incident CKD
- Statistical methods
Multivariable Cox; substitution models
5. Actual results
- Results
SSB >1 serving/day AHR 1.19 (1.05-1.34). ASB >0-1/day AHR 1.10 (1.01-1.20); >1/day 1.26 (1.12-1.43). Natural juice not associated (>1/day HR 0.99, 0.87-1.11). Replacing SSB with ASB: HR 1.03 (0.96-1.10); replacing 1 serving/day SSB with juice 0.93 (0.87-0.97) or water 0.93 (0.88-0.99).
- Absolute risks
Overall cumulative incidence 3.5%; illustrative excess ~0.7 percentage points over 10.5 years at HR 1.19 (approximation, stats/C-SOD-09_ckd.py)
- Authors' conclusion
Lower consumption of SSB or ASB may reduce the risk of developing CKD.
6. Strengths
- Large prospective cohort
- Registry-based outcomes
- Substitution analysis
7. Weaknesses
- Observational
- Cola not analysed separately
- Diabetes and obesity as mediators/confounders
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- ROBINS-E
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Residual confounding.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Modest relative associations; the similar ASB association argues against sugar alone and suggests confounding or other components.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Supports a modest association between soft drinks and CKD (C-SOD-09), replacing the single 1980s case-control study as the main evidence.
11. Independent contrary findings
Lo 2021 meta-analysis (I-SOD-126): pooled RR not significant.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
UK data.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Best prospective evidence; association modest; causation not established.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | high |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | high |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | partly replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | mixed |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Cola-specific and phosphoric-acid-specific effects.
15. Linked fact checks
- Cola consumption damages the kidneys (chronic kidney disease). – Studies supporting the claim