Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-SRC-127 standard review

High insulin levels can make the body resistant to insulin

Effect of sustained physiologic hyperinsulinaemia and hyperglycaemia on insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in man.

Overview

Del Prato S et al.. Diabetologia 1994 · PMID 7851681 · DOI 10.1007/BF00400466

Four days of raised insulin reduced the body's response to insulin by 20-40% in healthy volunteers.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test whether high insulin causes insulin resistance

How was the study done?

Infusion experiment with clamp tests

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

15 healthy adults

What was actually found?

Insulin resistance developed

How large was the observed effect?

Glucose disposal -20 to -40%

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Too much insulin can feed the problem

What are the study's limitations?

Small, short

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the causal debate, not the denial of insulin resistance

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Long-term relevance

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Del Prato S et al.
Journal
Diabetologia
Year
1994
Identifier
PMID 7851681 DOI 10.1007/BF00400466
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works record checked
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

NIH grants; no COI statement.

2. Research question

Does sustained physiological hyperinsulinaemia cause insulin resistance in healthy humans?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Experimental infusion study (randomised protocols) with glucose clamps
Population

Healthy young adults

Country

USA

Period

Published 1994

Sample size

15

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Healthy volunteers

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

72-96 h euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemia (+72 pmol/l) or hyperglycaemic hyperinsulinaemia

Comparator

Pre-infusion clamp

Endpoints

Whole-body glucose disposal, insulin secretion

Statistical methods

Before-after comparison

5. Actual results

Results

After 4 days of sustained euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemia, whole-body glucose disposal decreased by 20-40%, due to impaired non-oxidative glucose disposal; insulin secretion response to hyperglycaemia was diminished.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Chronic physiological hyperinsulinaemia leads to insulin resistance; hyperinsulinaemia is not only a compensatory response but also a self-perpetuating cause of the defect in insulin action.

6. Strengths

  • Direct experimental manipulation in humans

7. Weaknesses

  • Very small
  • Short duration
  • Healthy volunteers

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Small mechanistic study.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Effect large in relative terms (20-40%) but in 15 people over 4 days.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Strongest supporting-side evidence for his underlying idea that high insulin is a driver. But it measures insulin resistance and thereby confirms that the phenomenon exists.

11. Independent contrary findings

I-SRC-112, I-SRC-128 (insulin resistance predicts diabetes).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Physiology universal.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports 'hyperinsulinaemia causes insulin resistance', not 'insulin resistance does not exist'.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Relevance of short infusions for long-term disease.

15. Linked fact checks