Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-SUP-08 in-depth review

USPSTF evidence review 2022

Vitamin and Mineral Supplements for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Overview

O'Connor EA et al.. JAMA 2022 · PMID 35727272 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.15650

Supplements gave little or no protection; beta-carotene harmful; multivitamins slightly fewer cancers.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Supplement benefits/harms.

How was the study done?

SR.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

739,803.

What was actually found?

Little benefit; some harms.

How large was the observed effect?

OR 0.93 MV cancer; 1.20 beta-carotene lung cancer.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Supplements are not a prevention strategy.

What are the study's limitations?

Not for deficiency.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Mixed.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Effects in deficient people.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
O'Connor EA et al.
Journal
JAMA
Year
2022
Identifier
PMID 35727272 DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.15650
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

2. Research question

Benefits and harms of vitamin/mineral supplements for CVD and cancer prevention

3. Study design and population

Study design
Systematic review – Updated evidence report and systematic review for USPSTF
Population

Adults without CVD, cancer or known deficiency

Country

Multinational

Period

2013–Feb 2022 + prior reviews

Sample size

84 studies, 739,803

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

No known deficiency

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Vitamins, minerals, multivitamins

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoints

Mortality, CVD, cancer, harms

Statistical methods

Rare-event pooling

5. Actual results

Results

Multivitamin: any cancer OR 0.93 (0.87–0.99), lung cancer OR 0.75; beta-carotene: lung cancer OR 1.20 (1.01–1.42), CV mortality OR 1.10; vitamin D: mortality OR 0.96 (n.s.); vitamin E: mortality OR 1.02 (n.s.); limited evidence of harms (hip fracture vitamin A, haemorrhagic stroke vitamin E, kidney stones vitamin C, calcium).

Absolute risks

ARD range for multivitamin cancer −0.2% to −1.2%

Authors' conclusion

Little or no benefit except small cancer benefit with multivitamins; beta-carotene harmful in high-risk persons.

6. Strengths

  • Comprehensive
  • No COI

7. Weaknesses

  • Excludes deficiency, pregnancy

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-SUP-01, -02, -03, -06.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Best overall evidence summary; supports most archive claims, limits some.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks