Otherindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-VEG-103 in-depth review

How much vitamin K changes warfarin effect

Effect of vitamin K intake on the stability of oral anticoagulant treatment: dose-response relationships in healthy subjects.

Overview

Schurgers LJ et al.. Blood 2004 · PMID 15231565 · DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1525

In anticoagulated volunteers, INR fell significantly only from 150 micrograms of daily vitamin K1 upwards; spinach and broccoli meals had short-lived effects.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Find the vitamin K dose that disturbs anticoagulation.

How was the study done?

Step-wise supplement doses and test meals.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Healthy anticoagulated volunteers.

What was actually found?

Effect began at 150 ug/day; vegetable meals had brief effects.

How large was the observed effect?

Threshold 150 ug/day; clinically relevant in 25%.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Small, irregular servings of greens matter less than often feared.

What are the study's limitations?

Not patients; supplements; size not in abstract.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports and partly limits the claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Universal.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot quantify risk of bleeding or clotting.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Schurgers LJ et al.
Journal
Blood
Year
2004
Identifier
PMID 15231565 DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1525
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract; first author affiliation includes VitaK BV (a vitamin K research company) per PubMed record

2. Research question

What vitamin K intake threshold changes INR during oral anticoagulation?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Other – Dose-response study in stably anticoagulated healthy volunteers (weekly incremental vitamin K1 supplements 50-500 ug/day) plus test meals of spinach and broccoli
Population

Healthy volunteers anticoagulated for 13 weeks on individualized doses

Country

Netherlands (Maastricht; from author affiliation)

Period

not stated in abstract

Sample size

not stated in abstract

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Vitamin K1 supplements 50-500 ug/day for 7 days each; vitamin K-rich meals

Comparator

Lower doses / baseline

Endpoints

INR; undercarboxylated FII and osteocalcin

Statistical methods

Dose-response comparison

5. Actual results

Results

Threshold K1 dose causing a significant INR decrease: 150 ug/day; clinically relevant INR change in 25% of participants at 150 ug/day. Response to spinach and broccoli meals was short-lived, suggesting inefficient bioavailability.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Short-term variability in vitamin K1 intake is less important for INR fluctuations than commonly assumed; supplements providing 100 ug/day do not significantly interfere with oral anticoagulant therapy.

6. Strengths

  • Controlled dose-response design
  • Tests real foods as well as supplements

7. Weaknesses

  • Healthy volunteers, not patients
  • Sample size not given in abstract
  • Supplements differ from food matrix

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Non-randomized dose escalation.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Threshold effect at 150 ug/day; Violi 2016 translates 150 ug/day to ~30 g cooked spinach.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Mixed: shows an INR effect above ~150 ug/day but suggests food vitamin K is less bioavailable and short-term variability matters less than assumed.

11. Independent contrary findings

Franco 2004 found larger diet effects in patients.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Universal.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Limits the claim: only sustained, substantial increases shift INR.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Effects of habitual high-greens diets in real patients.

15. Linked fact checks