Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-VEG-123 standard review

Nitrate from vegetables linked to less heart disease

Vegetable nitrate intake, blood pressure and incident cardiovascular disease: Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health Study.

Overview

Bondonno CP et al.. Eur J Epidemiol 2021 · PMID 33884541 · DOI 10.1007/s10654-021-00747-3

Danes eating about a cup of leafy greens' worth of nitrate daily had 15% less cardiovascular disease than those eating the least.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Relate vegetable nitrate to BP and CVD.

How was the study done?

Cohort, 23 years.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

53,150 adults.

What was actually found?

Lower BP and CVD with moderate intake.

How large was the observed effect?

HR 0.85 (0.82-0.89).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Nitrate from greens does not appear harmful for adults; it may be protective.

What are the study's limitations?

Observational.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts the claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

European.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot prove causation.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Bondonno CP et al.
Journal
Eur J Epidemiol
Year
2021
Identifier
PMID 33884541 DOI 10.1007/s10654-021-00747-3
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

COI statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. | Funding (PubMed grant list): Healy Medical Research Foundation; National Health and Medical Research Council; National Health and Medical Research Council e Médicale (FR); National Health and Medical Research Council he Médicale (FR); National Heart Foundation of Australia; The Danish Heart Foundation; Wellcome Trust

2. Research question

Is habitual vegetable nitrate intake associated with blood pressure and incident CVD?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Prospective cohort (Danish Diet, Cancer and Health), 23 years follow-up
Population

Danish adults without baseline CVD

Country

Denmark

Period

Baseline 1993-1997; 23 years follow-up

Sample size

53,150 (14,088 CVD cases)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Vegetable nitrate (comprehensive database)

Comparator

Lowest quintile (median 23 mg/day)

Endpoints

Baseline BP; incident CVD and subtypes

Statistical methods

Restricted cubic splines in Cox models; mediation by SBP

5. Actual results

Results

Highest quintile (median 141 mg/day): SBP -2.58 mmHg (-3.12 to -2.05), DBP -1.38 mmHg. Moderate intake (median 59 mg/day) vs lowest: CVD HR 0.85 (0.82-0.89); 12-26% lower ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, ischaemic stroke and PAD hospitalisations; plateau at ~60 mg/day; 21.9% mediated by SBP.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Consumption of at least ~60 mg/day of vegetable nitrate (~1 cup of green leafy vegetables) may mitigate CVD risk.

6. Strengths

  • Large, long follow-up
  • Detailed nitrate database

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational
  • Single FFQ at baseline
  • Correlated with overall vegetable intake

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Residual confounding by healthy lifestyle.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

HR CI log-symmetric within rounding (stats/C-VEG-08_nitrate.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Directly contradicts the idea that vegetable nitrate harms adults.

11. Independent contrary findings

Ward 2010 thyroid cancer signal (imprecise).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

European cohort.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Consistent with BP-lowering RCTs (Siervo 2013).

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Separation from total vegetable effects.

15. Linked fact checks