Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-VEG-126 standard review

Possible thyroid signal for nitrate in one cohort

Nitrate intake and the risk of thyroid cancer and thyroid disease.

Overview

Ward MH et al.. Epidemiology 2010 · PMID 20335813 · DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d6201d

In Iowa women, the highest dietary nitrate intake was linked to more thyroid cancer, but the estimate was very imprecise.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Relate nitrate to thyroid outcomes.

How was the study done?

Cohort.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

21,977 women.

What was actually found?

Weak positive association.

How large was the observed effect?

RR 2.9 (1.0-8.1).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

A possible signal needing confirmation, not proof of harm.

What are the study's limitations?

Few cases.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Weak support.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show that vegetables harm the thyroid.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Ward MH et al.
Journal
Epidemiology
Year
2010
Identifier
PMID 20335813 DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d6201d
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Funding (PubMed grant list): Intramural NIH HHS; NCI NIH HHS

2. Research question

Is nitrate intake from water and diet associated with thyroid cancer and thyroid disease?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Prospective cohort (Iowa Women's Health Study)
Population

Older women in Iowa using the same water supply >10 years

Country

USA

Period

1986-2004

Sample size

21,977

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Nitrate in public water (1955-1988) and dietary nitrate (FFQ)

Comparator

Lowest quartile

Endpoints

Thyroid cancer incidence; self-reported hypo/hyperthyroidism

Statistical methods

Relative risks; prevalence odds ratios

5. Actual results

Results

Water nitrate >5 mg/L nitrate-N for >=5 years: thyroid cancer RR 2.6 (1.1-6.2). Dietary nitrate highest vs lowest quartile: thyroid cancer RR 2.9 (1.0-8.1; P trend 0.046); hypothyroidism prevalence OR 1.2 (1.1-1.4); no association with hyperthyroidism.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Nitrate may play a role in the etiology of thyroid cancer and warrants further study.

6. Strengths

  • Long-term water exposure data

7. Weaknesses

  • Few cases; imprecise
  • Self-reported thyroid disease
  • Dietary nitrate highly correlated with vegetable intake

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Confounding and few cases.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Dietary RR 2.9 (1.0-8.1): borderline, p ~0.05 (stats/C-VEG-08_nitrate.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

The only signal found that points toward harm from dietary (mostly vegetable) nitrate; imprecise and not replicated.

11. Independent contrary findings

Bondonno 2021/2024; Erichsen 2025.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

US cohort.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Weak supporting evidence; insufficient to establish harm.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilitynot replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceinconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Replication for thyroid outcomes.

15. Linked fact checks