Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked★ key study A-BAR-15 in-depth review
Self-harm emergencies after surgery in Ontario
Self-harm Emergencies After Bariatric Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Overview
Bhatti JA et al.. JAMA Surg 2016 · PMID 26444444 · DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.3414
Emergency visits for self-harm rose from 2.33 to 3.63 per 1000 patient-years after surgery.
Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Self-harm risk
- How was the study done?
Self-matched cohort
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
8815
- What was actually found?
Increase after surgery
- How large was the observed effect?
RR 1.54
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
A rare but real risk, mostly in people with prior mental illness
- What are the study's limitations?
No external control
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Supports
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applicable
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Causation
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Bhatti JA, Nathens AB, Thiruchelvam D, Grantcharov T, Goldstein BI, Redelmeier DA
- Journal
- JAMA Surg
- Year
- 2016
- Identifier
- PMID 26444444 DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.3414
- Verification
- verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
COI: not stated in record | Grants: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
2. Research question
Self-harm emergencies before vs after bariatric surgery
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Cohort study – Population-based self-matched (before-after) cohort
- Population
Ontario adults undergoing bariatric surgery (98.5% gastric bypass)
- Country
Canada
- Period
2006-2011 surgery; 3 years before/after
- Sample size
8815
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Post-surgery period
- Comparator
Pre-surgery period (same patients)
- Endpoints
Self-harm emergency visits
- Statistical methods
Rate ratio
5. Actual results
- Results
Self-harm emergencies 3.63 vs 2.33 per 1000 patient-years after vs before, RR 1.54 (1.03-2.30). Higher in >35 years RR 1.76, low income RR 2.09, rural RR 6.49. 72.8% intentional overdose; 93.0% of events in patients with a mental health diagnosis in the 5 years before surgery.
- Absolute risks
Absolute increase about 1.3 per 1000 patient-years (3.63 - 2.33, calculated from reported rates)
- Authors' conclusion
Risk of self-harm emergencies increased after surgery; screening for suicide risk during follow-up needed.
6. Strengths
- Population-based
- Self-matched design controls stable personal factors
7. Weaknesses
- Time trends not controlled
- Only gastric bypass
- Wide CI
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- ROBINS-E
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Supports C-BAR-07.
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Applicable.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Correctly cited (EN); AR typo; context on absolute risk missing.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | low |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | moderate |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | essentially correct but incomplete |
14. Open questions
15. Linked fact checks
- Bariatric surgery is followed by documented rises in self-harm, suicide-related deaths and alcohol use disorder. – Studies supporting the claim
Use by the Tayebat archive
Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.
- What the archive says about the study
Self-harm emergencies rose ~50% after bariatric surgery in 8,815 Ontario adults (3.63 vs 2.33 per 1000 patient-years; RR 1.54).
- A. What was actually studied?
Self-harm before vs after
- B. What did the authors find?
RR 1.54
- C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?
Risk increased; screening needed
- D. What does the archive derive from it?
Used to document self-harm risk.
- E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?
English numbers correct. The Arabic headline contains a typo (3.63 vs 2.63 instead of 2.33). The archive does not mention that 93% of events occurred in patients with prior mental health diagnoses or that absolute rates are low.
- Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
- essentially correct but incomplete