Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-BAR-06 in-depth review

Meta-analysis: self-harm after surgery

Risk of Suicide and Self-harm Is Increased After Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Overview

Castaneda D et al.. Obes Surg 2019 · PMID 30343409 · DOI 10.1007/s11695-018-3493-4

Self-harm attempts were about twice as common after surgery as before; suicides occurred in about 2.7 per 1000 patients.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Self-harm

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

148,643

What was actually found?

Increased risk

How large was the observed effect?

OR 1.9 / 3.8

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Mental-health screening matters

What are the study's limitations?

Observational

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Causation

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Castaneda D et al.
Journal
Obes Surg
Year
2019
Identifier
PMID 30343409 DOI 10.1007/s11695-018-3493-4
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Suicide and self-harm after bariatric surgery

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis
Population

Bariatric patients

Period

To Jan 2018

Sample size

32 studies, 148,643

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Bariatric surgery

Comparator

Pre-surgery same population; matched controls

Endpoints

Suicide; suicide/self-harm attempts

5. Actual results

Results

Suicide event rate 2.7/1000 patients; attempt rate 17/1000. Self-harm/attempt OR 1.9 (1.23-2.95) vs same population pre-surgery and OR 3.8 (2.19-6.59) vs matched controls.

Absolute risks

Suicide 2.7 per 1000 patients

Authors' conclusion

Higher self-harm/suicide attempt risk vs matched controls.

6. Strengths

  • Comprehensive

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational studies
  • Overlap with Bhatti/Neovius

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Includes A-BAR-15 and A-BAR-16 cohorts; not independent.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports C-BAR-07.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Confirms association; absolute risk low.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks