Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-FAST-116 in-depth review
One meal a day and death risk
Meal Skipping and Shorter Meal Intervals Are Associated with Increased Risk of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality among US Adults.
Overview
Sun Y et al.. J Acad Nutr Diet 2023 · PMID 35964910 · DOI 10.1016/j.jand.2022.08.119
US adults who ate only one meal a day had a higher death rate, but this type of study cannot prove the meal pattern caused it.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Link meal patterns to mortality.
- How was the study done?
Cohort of 24,011 adults followed for deaths.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
US adults aged 40+.
- What was actually found?
HR 1.30 all-cause, 1.83 CVD for one meal/day.
- How large was the observed effect?
HR 1.30 (1.03-1.64).
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
No evidence that one meal a day is healthier; possibly the opposite.
- What are the study's limitations?
Diet recorded once; confounding.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts 'the healthy way to eat', at low certainty.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applies; same physiology.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Causation.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Sun Y et al.
- Journal
- J Acad Nutr Diet
- Year
- 2023
- Identifier
- PMID 35964910 DOI 10.1016/j.jand.2022.08.119
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref update-to/updated-by check
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
not stated in abstract
2. Research question
Are meal frequency, skipping and intervals associated with mortality?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Cohort study – Prospective cohort (NHANES 1999-2014 linked to death records)
- Population
US adults aged >=40
- Country
USA
- Period
1999-2014; mortality to 2015
- Sample size
24,011; 4,175 deaths (878 CVD)
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
not stated in abstract
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
One meal/day; meal skipping; meal intervals (24-h recall)
- Comparator
Three meals/day
- Endpoints
All-cause and CVD mortality
- Statistical methods
Multivariable Cox models
5. Actual results
- Results
One meal/day vs three: all-cause mortality HR 1.30 (95% CI 1.03-1.64), CVD mortality HR 1.83 (1.26-2.65). Breakfast skipping CVD HR 1.40 (1.09-1.78); lunch skipping all-cause HR 1.12 (1.01-1.24); dinner skipping 1.16 (1.02-1.32).
- Absolute risks
Whole cohort 22.5 deaths per 1,000 person-years (calculated); group-specific absolute risks not reported.
- Authors' conclusion
Eating one meal per day was associated with increased all-cause and CVD mortality.
6. Strengths
- Large nationally representative cohort
- Mortality linkage
7. Weaknesses
- Single 24-h recall; misclassification
- Residual confounding (illness, poverty, smoking)
- Reverse causation possible
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- ROBINS-E
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- high
- Rationale
Observational; exposure measured once; confounding.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
CIs log-symmetric; association only, cannot show causation; see stats/I-FAST-116_meal_skipping.py.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Observational signal of harm for habitual one-meal-a-day eating; does not prove causation.
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Universal biology; applies in Europe and Egypt.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Low-certainty contradicting evidence; must not be overstated.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | high |
| Precision of results | moderate |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | not replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | unknown |
| Regional transferability | moderate |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
15. Linked fact checks
- Long daily intermittent fasting with one meal a day as the default eating pattern (and sometimes eating once every two days) is the healthy way to eat. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim