Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkfull text checked I-GUT-06 standard review

When abdominal pressure becomes dangerous

Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome.

Overview

Kirkpatrick AW et al.. Intensive Care Med 2013 · PMID 23673399 · DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-2906-z

Harmful pressure starts at ≥12 mmHg sustained, in critically ill patients.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

IAH definitions.

How was the study done?

Consensus.

What was actually found?

Thresholds defined.

How large was the observed effect?

≥12 mmHg; >20 mmHg.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Ordinary bloating is not ACS.

What are the study's limitations?

ICU focus.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts C-GUT-04.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Normal post-meal values.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Kirkpatrick AW et al.
Journal
Intensive Care Med
Year
2013
Identifier
PMID 23673399 DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-2906-z
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
full text
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Definitions and management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome

3. Study design and population

Study design
Guideline / position statement – Consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines (WSACS), GRADE
Population

Critically ill patients

Country

International

Period

2013

4. Methods and endpoints

Endpoints

Definitions; recommendations

Statistical methods

Modified Delphi; GRADE

5. Actual results

Results

Full text: IAP is approximately 5–7 mmHg in critically ill adults; IAH is a sustained or repeated pathological IAP ≥12 mmHg; ACS is sustained IAP >20 mmHg with new organ dysfunction; grades I–IV (12–15, 16–20, 21–25, >25 mmHg).

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

IAH/ACS are common in critical illness; evidence quality generally low.

6. Strengths

  • International consensus

7. Weaknesses

  • Low-quality evidence base

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Consensus.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-GUT-04.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Defines thresholds far above ordinary bloating.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Post-meal IAP in healthy people not covered.

15. Linked fact checks