Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study I-INS-134 in-depth review

NICE guideline NG17: Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management

NICE guideline NG17: Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management

Overview

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). NICE guideline 2015

UK guideline: insulin is standard for all adults with T1D; DKA treated with IV saline and IV insulin.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

National guidance.

How was the study done?

Evidence-based guideline.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Not applicable.

What was actually found?

Rec 1.7.1: offer multiple daily injection basal-bolus insulin regimens as the regimen of choice for all adults with T1D. Rec 1.10.1: consider ketone monitoring as part of sick-day rules. Recs 1.10.5-1.10.7: use isotonic saline for fluid replacement in DKA and give intravenous insulin by infusion. Misdiagnosis of T1D as T2D 'could lead to the person not receiving insulin treatment and a subsequent risk of diabetic ketoacidosis'.

How large was the observed effect?

Not applicable.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

UK guideline: insulin is standard for all adults with T1D; DKA treated with IV saline and IV insulin.

What are the study's limitations?

Guideline.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts insulin-free management.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

UK.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Not applicable.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
Journal
NICE guideline
Year
2015
Identifier
Verification
verified – Recommendations page fetched 2026-10-26 (Published 26 August 2015; last updated 17 August 2022)
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
full text
Conflicts of interest and funding

NICE (public body).

2. Research question

Diagnosis and management of diabetes

3. Study design and population

Study design
Guideline / position statement – National clinical guideline
Population

People with diabetes in England/Wales

Country

United Kingdom

Period

Published 26 August 2015; last updated 17 August 2022

Sample size

Not applicable

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Not applicable

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Not applicable

Comparator

Not applicable

Endpoints

Recommendations

Statistical methods

Not applicable

5. Actual results

Results

Rec 1.7.1: offer multiple daily injection basal-bolus insulin regimens as the regimen of choice for all adults with T1D. Rec 1.10.1: consider ketone monitoring as part of sick-day rules. Recs 1.10.5-1.10.7: use isotonic saline for fluid replacement in DKA and give intravenous insulin by infusion. Misdiagnosis of T1D as T2D 'could lead to the person not receiving insulin treatment and a subsequent risk of diabetic ketoacidosis'.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

UK guideline: insulin is standard for all adults with T1D; DKA treated with IV saline and IV insulin.

6. Strengths

  • Current, evidence-graded recommendations

7. Weaknesses

  • Consensus elements; partly expert opinion

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Guideline; graded recommendations from systematic evidence review.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Not applicable

10. Relevance to the specific claim

UK guideline: insulin is standard for all adults with T1D; DKA treated with IV saline and IV insulin.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

UK guideline; consistent with European practice.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Authoritative national guideline.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks