Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-INTB-17 standard review

Vaccines do not cause autism

Vaccines are not associated with autism: an evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies.

Overview

Taylor LE, Swerdfeger AL, Eslick GD. Vaccine 2014 · PMID 24814559 · DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.085

In over 1.2 million children, vaccination was not linked to autism.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test vaccine-autism link

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

10 studies

What was actually found?

No association

How large was the observed effect?

OR 0.99

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Fear of autism is not a reason to avoid vaccines.

What are the study's limitations?

Observational; abstract only

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts vaccine rejection based on autism fears.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Taylor LE, Swerdfeger AL, Eslick GD
Journal
Vaccine
Year
2014
Identifier
PMID 24814559 DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.085
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

no COI statement in record

2. Research question

Are childhood vaccinations associated with autism?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies
Population

Children

Country

Multinational

Period

search to April 2014

Sample size

5 cohort studies (1,256,407 children), 5 case-control studies (9,920 children)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies on vaccine administration and autism/ASD

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Vaccination, MMR, thimerosal, mercury

Comparator

Unvaccinated/unexposed

Endpoints

Autism, ASD

Statistical methods

Pooled OR

5. Actual results

Results

Cohort data: no relationship between vaccination and autism (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92-1.06) or ASD (OR 0.91, 0.68-1.20), MMR (OR 0.84, 0.70-1.01), thimerosal (OR 1.00, 0.77-1.31) or mercury (OR 1.00, 0.93-1.07). Case-control data: no increased risk (OR 0.90, 0.83-0.98; OR 0.85, 0.76-0.95).

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Vaccinations are not associated with the development of autism or autism spectrum disorder.

6. Strengths

  • Over 1.2 million children in cohorts

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational data
  • Abstract only read

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Observational primary studies.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Precise null associations.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Addresses a common fear behind vaccine refusal.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Consistent null finding.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks