Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-LEG-123 standard review
Iron-rich beans improved iron status
Consuming Iron Biofortified Beans Increases Iron Status in Rwandan Women after 128 Days in a Randomized Controlled Feeding Trial.
Overview
Haas JD et al.. J Nutr 2016 · PMID 27358417 · DOI 10.3945/jn.115.224741
Women eating iron-rich beans for 128 days had higher haemoglobin and iron stores than women eating ordinary beans.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Test iron-biofortified beans.
- How was the study done?
RCT.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
195 iron-deficient women.
- What was actually found?
Better iron status.
- How large was the observed effect?
Hb +3.8 g/L.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Iron in beans is absorbed and useful, despite phytate.
- What are the study's limitations?
Comparator also beans.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Limits C-LEG-08.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Indirect.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
It does not compare beans with no beans.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Haas JD et al.
- Journal
- J Nutr
- Year
- 2016
- Identifier
- PMID 27358417 DOI 10.3945/jn.115.224741
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref works API
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
Not stated in abstract.
2. Research question
Do iron-biofortified beans improve iron status in iron-depleted women?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Randomised controlled trial – Randomised controlled feeding trial (128 days)
- Population
195 Rwandan women aged 18-27 y with serum ferritin <20 ug/L
- Country
Rwanda
- Period
128 days (NCT01594359)
- Sample size
195
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Ferritin <20 ug/L.
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Iron-biofortified beans (86 mg Fe/kg), twice daily
- Comparator
Standard beans (50 mg Fe/kg)
- Endpoints
Haemoglobin, ferritin, sTfR, body iron
- Statistical methods
Mixed-effects regression with repeated measures
5. Actual results
- Results
Both groups ate ~336 g wet beans/day; Fe-Beans group had greater increases in haemoglobin (3.8 g/L), log ferritin (0.1 log ug/L) and body iron (0.5 mg/kg); each 1 g Fe from beans over 128 days associated with +4.2 g/L haemoglobin.
- Absolute risks
Not applicable
- Authors' conclusion
Iron-biofortified beans significantly improved iron status.
6. Strengths
- Randomised
- Objective biomarkers
- Real diet with high bean intake
7. Weaknesses
- Biofortified beans; comparator also beans
- Abstract only
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- RoB 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- low
- Rationale
Randomised feeding trial.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Effect moderate; shows that bean iron is absorbed despite phytate.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Limits C-LEG-08: despite phytate, beans can improve iron status; supports legumes as an iron source rather than a reason to avoid them.
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Indirect (biofortified varieties).
13. Overall methodological judgement
Strong evidence that bean iron is nutritionally available.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | high |
| Risk of bias | low |
| Precision of results | moderate |
| Directness | indirect |
| Reproducibility | partly replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | moderate |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Ordinary beans vs no beans.
15. Linked fact checks
- Phytic acid in legumes inhibits iron and zinc absorption; iron bioavailability is 5-12% from vegetarian diets versus 14-18% from mixed diets. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim