Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-LEG-123 standard review

Iron-rich beans improved iron status

Consuming Iron Biofortified Beans Increases Iron Status in Rwandan Women after 128 Days in a Randomized Controlled Feeding Trial.

Overview

Haas JD et al.. J Nutr 2016 · PMID 27358417 · DOI 10.3945/jn.115.224741

Women eating iron-rich beans for 128 days had higher haemoglobin and iron stores than women eating ordinary beans.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test iron-biofortified beans.

How was the study done?

RCT.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

195 iron-deficient women.

What was actually found?

Better iron status.

How large was the observed effect?

Hb +3.8 g/L.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Iron in beans is absorbed and useful, despite phytate.

What are the study's limitations?

Comparator also beans.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Limits C-LEG-08.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Indirect.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

It does not compare beans with no beans.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Haas JD et al.
Journal
J Nutr
Year
2016
Identifier
PMID 27358417 DOI 10.3945/jn.115.224741
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref works API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Not stated in abstract.

2. Research question

Do iron-biofortified beans improve iron status in iron-depleted women?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Randomised controlled feeding trial (128 days)
Population

195 Rwandan women aged 18-27 y with serum ferritin <20 ug/L

Country

Rwanda

Period

128 days (NCT01594359)

Sample size

195

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Ferritin <20 ug/L.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Iron-biofortified beans (86 mg Fe/kg), twice daily

Comparator

Standard beans (50 mg Fe/kg)

Endpoints

Haemoglobin, ferritin, sTfR, body iron

Statistical methods

Mixed-effects regression with repeated measures

5. Actual results

Results

Both groups ate ~336 g wet beans/day; Fe-Beans group had greater increases in haemoglobin (3.8 g/L), log ferritin (0.1 log ug/L) and body iron (0.5 mg/kg); each 1 g Fe from beans over 128 days associated with +4.2 g/L haemoglobin.

Absolute risks

Not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Iron-biofortified beans significantly improved iron status.

6. Strengths

  • Randomised
  • Objective biomarkers
  • Real diet with high bean intake

7. Weaknesses

  • Biofortified beans; comparator also beans
  • Abstract only

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low
Rationale

Randomised feeding trial.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Effect moderate; shows that bean iron is absorbed despite phytate.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Limits C-LEG-08: despite phytate, beans can improve iron status; supports legumes as an iron source rather than a reason to avoid them.

11. Independent contrary findings

I-LEG-122.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Indirect (biofortified varieties).

13. Overall methodological judgement

Strong evidence that bean iron is nutritionally available.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Ordinary beans vs no beans.

15. Linked fact checks