Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-ODD-13 in-depth review

RECORD: rosiglitazone heart outcomes

Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial.

Overview

Home PD et al.. Lancet 2009 · PMID 19501900 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60953-3

Overall heart outcomes were not worse, but heart failure doubled; heart-attack effect unclear.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

CV outcomes of add-on rosiglitazone

How was the study done?

Multicentre open-label RCT (RECORD main results)

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

4,447; Type 2 diabetes on metformin or SU, HbA1c 7.9%

What was actually found?

Non-inferior CV; HF HR 2.10.

How large was the observed effect?

HR 0.99 primary

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Avoid in heart failure.

What are the study's limitations?

Open-label; Manufacturer funded; Low event rates

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports HF part, limits MI part of C-ODD-09; limits C-ODD-05.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

European trial.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Settle MI risk.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Home PD et al.
Journal
Lancet
Year
2009
Identifier
PMID 19501900 DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60953-3
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25 (this agent)
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Funded by GlaxoSmithKline.

2. Research question

CV outcomes of add-on rosiglitazone

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Multicentre open-label RCT (RECORD main results)
Population

Type 2 diabetes on metformin or SU, HbA1c 7.9%

Country

Europe and Australasia

Period

Mean 5.5 years

Sample size

4,447

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

As described in the abstract; details not available in abstract.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Rosiglitazone add-on

Comparator

Metformin + sulfonylurea

Endpoints

CV hospitalisation or CV death

Statistical methods

Cox; non-inferiority margin 1.20

5. Actual results

Results

Primary 321 vs 323 (HR 0.99, 0.85-1.16), non-inferior; CV death HR 0.84 (0.59-1.18); MI HR 1.14 (0.80-1.63); stroke 0.72; HF HR 2.10 (1.35-3.27); more fractures mainly in women.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Rosiglitazone increases HF and some fractures; MI data inconclusive; no increase in overall CV morbidity or mortality.

6. Strengths

  • RCT
  • Long follow-up

7. Weaknesses

  • Open-label
  • Manufacturer funded
  • Low event rates

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Open-label; industry.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

MI CI wide.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports HF part, limits MI part of C-ODD-09; limits C-ODD-05.

11. Independent contrary findings

A-ODD-01.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

European trial.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Confirms HF, not MI.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

None beyond those stated.

15. Linked fact checks