Case-control studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-ORG-120 standard review

Breastfeeding and adenoid size in preschool children

Impact of Breastfeeding Duration on Adenoid Hypertrophy, Snoring and Acute Otitis Media: A Case-Control Study in Preschool Children.

Overview

Zwierz A et al.. J Clin Med 2023 · PMID 38137751 · DOI 10.3390/jcm12247683

Longer breastfeeding was linked to less snoring and fewer ear infections, but not to smaller adenoids.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Relate breastfeeding duration to adenoid size and snoring

How was the study done?

Case-control study

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

145 Polish children aged 3-5

What was actually found?

No effect on adenoid size; less snoring and AOM

How large was the observed effect?

Snoring risk >4-fold with <3 months

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Breastfeeding has benefits but does not seem to prevent adenoid enlargement

What are the study's limitations?

Small, recall bias

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts the claim

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

European

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot prove causation

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Zwierz A et al.
Journal
J Clin Med
Year
2023
Identifier
PMID 38137751 DOI 10.3390/jcm12247683
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Not stated in abstract.

2. Research question

Is breastfeeding duration related to adenoid size, snoring and acute otitis media?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Case-control study – Case-control study of preschool children at an ENT outpatient clinic
Population

145 children aged 3-5 years

Country

Poland

Period

2022-2023

Sample size

145

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Children admitted to ENT outpatient clinic with nasopharyngoscopy

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Breastfeeding duration (1, 3, 6+ months)

Comparator

Shorter breastfeeding

Endpoints

Adenoid size (A/C ratio), mucus coverage, snoring, AOM

Statistical methods

Univariable and multivariable analysis

5. Actual results

Results

Breastfeeding 3 and 6 months or more reduced snoring (p = 0.021; p = 0.039); breastfeeding < 3 months was an independent factor for snoring (more than four-fold risk). Breastfeeding duration had NO effect on adenoid size, mucus coverage or open-mouth sleeping. Breastfeeding was associated with less AOM.

Absolute risks

Not reported

Authors' conclusion

Longer breastfeeding was linked to less snoring and AOM, but not to adenoid size; the snoring link is probably via craniofacial development and muscle tone.

6. Strengths

  • Endoscopic measurement of adenoid size

7. Weaknesses

  • Small clinic sample
  • Recall of breastfeeding
  • Confounding

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
high
Rationale

Small case-control, recall bias.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

P values only in abstract.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Directly measures adenoid size against infant feeding.

11. Independent contrary findings

Storari 2021 suggests protection against snoring.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

European (Polish) sample.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Contradicts the claim that infant feeding determines adenoid enlargement; weak study.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biashigh
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Replication in prospective cohorts.

15. Linked fact checks