Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-PPI-07 in-depth review

Does ranitidine form NDMA in people?

Effect of Oral Ranitidine on Urinary Excretion of N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Overview

Florian J et al.. JAMA 2021 · PMID 34180947 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.9199

Ranitidine did not raise NDMA in urine compared with placebo.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

In-vivo NDMA.

How was the study done?

Crossover RCT.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

18 healthy adults.

What was actually found?

No increase.

How large was the observed effect?

Median difference 0 ng.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Lab extremes not seen in people.

What are the study's limitations?

Small; urinary marker.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts C-PPI-08.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Long-term cancer risk.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Florian J et al.
Journal
JAMA
Year
2021
Identifier
PMID 34180947 DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.9199
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Does oral ranitidine increase 24-h urinary NDMA?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial (FDA)
Population

Healthy adults

Country

USA

Period

June–July 2020

Sample size

18 (17 completed)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Healthy participants

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Ranitidine 300 mg with non-cured and cured-meat diets

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoints

24-h urinary NDMA

Statistical methods

Paired differences

5. Actual results

Results

Median NDMA: ranitidine 0.6 ng vs placebo 10.5 ng (non-cured), 11.9 vs 23.4 ng (cured); paired differences 0 (P=.54) and −1.1 ng (P=.71).

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Findings do not support that ranitidine is converted to NDMA in a general, healthy population.

6. Strengths

  • Randomised, blinded, crossover
  • Diet with high nitrite tested

7. Weaknesses

  • Small
  • Urinary NDMA is an indirect marker

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low
Rationale

Simplified.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Small but direct human test.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-PPI-08.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Ranitidine not marketed in EU.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Direct in-vivo evidence against large NDMA formation.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceunknown
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Gastric NDMA in people with high nitrite.

15. Linked fact checks