Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-UPF-120 in-depth review

Food colours, sodium benzoate and children's behaviour

Food additives and hyperactive behaviour in 3-year-old and 8/9-year-old children in the community: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Overview

McCann D et al.. Lancet 2007 · PMID 17825405 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61306-3

In a blinded trial, drinks with artificial colours plus the preservative sodium benzoate slightly increased hyperactive behaviour in children.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

To test additives on children's behaviour.

How was the study done?

Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

297 children.

What was actually found?

Small increase in hyperactivity.

How large was the observed effect?

Effect sizes 0.12-0.32.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Some additive mixtures may affect sensitive children.

What are the study's limitations?

Benzoate and colours not separated.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Limits C-UPF-11.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show benzoate alone is harmful.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
McCann D et al.
Journal
Lancet
Year
2007
Identifier
PMID 17825405 DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61306-3
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections

ErratumIn: Lancet. 2007 Nov 3;370(9598):1542 (erratum notice; no retraction)

Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

No COI statement in PubMed record

2. Research question

Do artificial food colours and sodium benzoate affect hyperactive behaviour in children from the general population?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial
Population

3-year-old and 8/9-year-old children

Country

UK (community sample; location not detailed in abstract)

Period

Not stated in abstract

Sample size

153 3-year-olds and 144 8/9-year-olds

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Community sample

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Drink containing sodium benzoate plus colour mix A or B

Comparator

Placebo drink

Endpoints

Global hyperactivity aggregate (GHA)

Statistical methods

Per-protocol analysis; effect sizes

5. Actual results

Results

3-year-olds: mix A vs placebo effect size 0.20 (0.01-0.39), P=0.044; not mix B; restricted analysis 0.32 (0.05-0.60). 8/9-year-olds (>=85% consumption, no missing data): mix A 0.12 (0.02-0.23), P=0.023; mix B 0.17 (0.07-0.28), P=0.001.

Absolute risks

Not applicable (continuous outcome)

Authors' conclusion

Artificial colours or sodium benzoate (or both) result in increased hyperactivity in children in the general population.

6. Strengths

  • Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover
  • General-population children

7. Weaknesses

  • Cannot separate benzoate from colours
  • Small effect sizes; per-protocol analysis
  • Erratum published (Lancet 2007;370:1542)

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Per-protocol; mixtures.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Small standardised effects (0.12-0.32).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Randomised evidence that a mixture containing sodium benzoate can affect children's behaviour; contradicts 'trivial' for children, though benzoate's own role is unclear.

11. Independent contrary findings

Effect cannot be attributed to benzoate alone; EFSA considered effects small.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Applicable to EU-authorised additives; regulatory follow-up not reviewed here.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Limits a blanket statement for children; does not show harm of benzoate alone.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Benzoate-only effect.

15. Linked fact checks