Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-VEG-05 in-depth review

Dietary oxalate and kidney stones

Oxalate intake and the risk for nephrolithiasis.

Overview

Taylor EN, Curhan GC. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007 · PMID 17538185 · DOI 10.1681/ASN.2007020219

Highest oxalate intake raised stone risk only modestly (about 20%) in some groups; authors: not a major risk factor.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Oxalate and stones

How was the study done?

Cohorts

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

240,681

What was actually found?

Modest or no association

How large was the observed effect?

RR ~1.2

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Greens not a major stone risk.

What are the study's limitations?

FFQ

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts general claim

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot address stone formers specifically.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Taylor EN, Curhan GC
Journal
J Am Soc Nephrol
Year
2007
Identifier
PMID 17538185 DOI 10.1681/ASN.2007020219
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

NIH funding

2. Research question

Is dietary oxalate associated with kidney stones?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Three prospective cohorts (HPFS, NHS I, NHS II)
Population

US health professionals

Country

USA

Period

Combined 44 years follow-up

Sample size

240,681 (45,985 men; 92,872 older women; 101,824 younger women); 4,605 stones

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Cohort participants

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Dietary oxalate (FFQ); spinach

Comparator

Lowest quintile / <1 serving per month spinach

Endpoints

Incident kidney stones

Statistical methods

Cox regression

5. Actual results

Results

Highest vs lowest oxalate quintile: RR 1.22 (1.03-1.45) men, 1.21 (1.01-1.44) older women, no association in younger women; spinach ≥8 servings/month: RR 1.30 (1.08-1.58) men, 1.34 (1.10-1.64) older women; spinach >40% of oxalate intake.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Data do not implicate dietary oxalate as a major risk factor for nephrolithiasis.

6. Strengths

  • Large
  • Repeated FFQ

7. Weaknesses

  • FFQ oxalate estimates imprecise
  • Self-reported stones

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Observational.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Modest relative risks.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Directly tests C-VEG-05.

11. Independent contrary findings

None.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Moderate.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Key evidence.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Effect in stone formers.

15. Linked fact checks