Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-VEG-105 standard review

Low vitamin K intake linked to unstable warfarin control

Effect of Vitamin K Intake on the Stability of Treatment with Vitamin K Antagonists: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Overview

Dentali F et al.. Semin Thromb Hemost 2016 · PMID 27232386 · DOI 10.1055/s-0036-1581105

A review of 15 studies (1,838 patients) found unstable control more often in people with LOW vitamin K intake.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Review vitamin K intake and VKA stability.

How was the study done?

Systematic review.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

15 studies, 1,838 patients.

What was actually found?

Low intake linked to instability; supplements may help unstable patients.

How large was the observed effect?

No pooled estimate.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Avoiding greens does not make warfarin more stable.

What are the study's limitations?

Narrative; overlapping studies.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Argues against avoidance; supports consistent intake.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Universal.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot give a precise effect size.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Dentali F et al.
Journal
Semin Thromb Hemost
Year
2016
Identifier
PMID 27232386 DOI 10.1055/s-0036-1581105
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

What is the role of dietary vitamin K intake and vitamin K supplementation in the stability of VKA therapy?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Systematic review – Systematic review of observational and interventional studies (Medline, EMBASE)
Population

Patients on vitamin K antagonists

Country

Multiple

Period

Search date not stated in abstract

Sample size

15 studies, 1,838 patients

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Dietary vitamin K intake; vitamin K supplementation

Comparator

Lower intake / placebo

Endpoints

INR stability, time in therapeutic range

Statistical methods

Narrative synthesis (no pooled estimate reported in abstract)

5. Actual results

Results

Observational studies suggest an increased risk of unstable anticoagulation in patients with lower daily vitamin K intake. Daily vitamin K supplementation may be associated with a clinically relevant increase in time in therapeutic range in unstable patients; the effect appears small in unselected populations.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

The role of supplementation or a diet with controlled vitamin K content remains to be established; larger prospective studies are needed.

6. Strengths

  • Two databases
  • Covers diet and supplements

7. Weaknesses

  • Narrative synthesis
  • Small, heterogeneous primary studies
  • Overlaps with Violi 2016

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Abstract-level appraisal; no pooled analysis.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

No pooled effect; overlapping primary studies with Violi 2016 (A-VEG-17) - not independent confirmation.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Limits the claim: lower vitamin K intake, not higher, is associated with instability.

11. Independent contrary findings

Franco 2004; Couris 2006 (changes in intake shift INR).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Universal.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Consistent with Violi 2016: avoidance of greens is not supported; consistency matters.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Large RCTs of dietary counselling strategies.

15. Linked fact checks