Otherindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-VEG-118 standard review

Diet supplies a sizeable share of urine oxalate

Contribution of dietary oxalate to urinary oxalate excretion.

Overview

Holmes RP et al.. Kidney Int 2001 · PMID 11135080 · DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00488.x

In controlled diets, food supplied 24-42% of urinary oxalate, and more (53%) when calcium intake was low.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Quantify dietary contribution to urinary oxalate.

How was the study done?

Controlled feeding.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Healthy adults (n not in abstract).

What was actually found?

Dietary share 24-53%.

How large was the observed effect?

See results.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Eating calcium with oxalate-rich greens reduces oxalate absorption.

What are the study's limitations?

Small, physiological endpoint.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Mixed.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Universal.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show stone risk.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Holmes RP et al.
Journal
Kidney Int
Year
2001
Identifier
PMID 11135080 DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00488.x
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Funding (PubMed grant list): NCRR NIH HHS; NIDDK NIH HHS

2. Research question

What fraction of urinary oxalate comes from dietary oxalate?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Other – Controlled feeding study with formula and solid-food diets of known oxalate content
Population

Healthy adults

Country

USA

Period

not stated in abstract

Sample size

not stated in abstract

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Diets with 10, 50, 250 mg oxalate/2,500 kcal; formula 0 and 180 mg; calcium 1,002 vs 391 mg

Comparator

Different oxalate/calcium levels

Endpoints

24-h urinary oxalate

Statistical methods

Within-subject comparisons

5. Actual results

Results

Urinary oxalate rose with dietary oxalate; dietary contribution 24.4% +/- 15.5% (10 mg diet) to 41.5% +/- 9.1% (250 mg diet). Lowering calcium from 1,002 to 391 mg on a 250 mg oxalate diet raised urinary oxalate by 28.2% and the dietary share to 52.6%.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Dietary oxalate contributes more to urinary oxalate than previously recognized; dietary calcium influences oxalate bioavailability.

6. Strengths

  • Controlled diets with measured oxalate

7. Weaknesses

  • Small (size not in abstract)
  • Healthy volunteers, not stone outcomes

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Small controlled feeding study.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Shares are means +/- SD; no outcome data.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Mixed: dietary oxalate matters physiologically, and calcium co-ingestion strongly modifies it.

11. Independent contrary findings

Taylor 2008 (small effect in free-living people).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Universal.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports oxalate moderation and adequate calcium for stone formers; not evidence that greens cause stones in general.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Stone outcomes.

15. Linked fact checks