Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-SRC-108 standard review

ESMO guideline on weight loss in cancer

Cancer cachexia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines☆.

Overview

Arends J et al. (ESMO Guidelines Committee). ESMO Open 2021 · PMID 34144781 · DOI 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100092

Cancer patients on treatment should be screened for malnutrition and get at least 25-30 kcal per kg body weight per day.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Guide cachexia care

How was the study done?

Guideline

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

not applicable

What was actually found?

Screen and feed adequately; escalate nutrition when intake is low

How large was the observed effect?

not applicable

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Cancer patients need enough food, not fasting regimes

What are the study's limitations?

Low evidence levels for some points

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts fasting as treatment

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Arends J et al. (ESMO Guidelines Committee)
Journal
ESMO Open
Year
2021
Identifier
PMID 34144781 DOI 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100092
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works record checked; recommendation sections read in Europe PMC full text PMC8233663
Retracted
no
Corrections

Erratum published: ESMO Open. 2022 Dec;7(6):100614. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100614.

Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Several authors declared industry honoraria/consultancy (nutrition companies); erratum published 2022.

2. Research question

How should cancer cachexia be screened, assessed and managed in adults?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Guideline / position statement – ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline
Population

Adults with cancer

Country

International (ESMO)

Period

2021

Sample size

not applicable

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not applicable

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Nutrition, exercise, drugs

Comparator

not applicable

Endpoints

Recommendations

Statistical methods

ESMO levels of evidence and grades

5. Actual results

Results

Recommends regular nutritional screening and nutritional support in all patients receiving anticancer treatment with expected survival over a few months [V, B]; at least 25-30 kcal/kg body weight/day to maintain nutritional status [V, B]; protein of at least 1.2 and possibly up to 2 g/kg/day may be required; nutritional interventions for inadequate intake, escalated during anticancer therapy [II, A].

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Multimodal management with adequate energy and protein intake is recommended for patients at risk of or with cachexia.

6. Strengths

  • International guideline
  • Current reference in Europe

7. Weaknesses

  • Evidence levels for nutrition mostly low (V)

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Guideline; COIs declared.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Not applicable.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Contradicts using repeated fasting and reduced solid food as cancer treatment: guidance is to secure adequate energy and protein during cancer therapy.

11. Independent contrary findings

Short supervised fasting around chemotherapy is being studied (I-SRC-109, I-INTA-08).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

European guideline.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Reference standard.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks