Unclear / insufficient evidence Certainty of evidence: very low provisional C-RES-04

Beef cattle are injected with hormones (testosterone/androgens, 'Boldex' - presumably boldenone) and antibiotics to fatten them, so the meat is 'injected'.

Conclusion: Not applicable to the EU; unverified for Egypt.

Original statement

بتحنوا العجول ايه تتخنها كده اندروجين صح بتحنوها هرمونات تستسترون ذكوره صح

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

Beef cattle are injected with hormones (testosterone/androgens, 'Boldex' - presumably boldenone) and antibiotics to fatten them, so the meat is 'injected'.

Origin

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! مصدر الغذاء الوريد البابي (Open source)
Published
27 July 2025
Timestamp
0:49:58 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Elawady asks a guest (named as a cattle-farm owner) leading questions; 'بتحنوا' is a likely transcription of 'بتحقنوا' (you inject).
Claimed mechanism

Anabolic steroids and antibiotics as growth promoters.

Claimed health effect

Contaminated meat.

Population concerned

Consumers (Egypt)

Geographic restriction by Elawady

Speaks about local practice; no explicit restriction.

Diverging source versions

اللحمه البقري فيها مشكله يا شيري جرجس ما انا هتكلم عن اللحمه دلوقتي لان انا محقونه حاجه اسمها بولدكس

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الأكل وراء كل مشاكلك (Open source)
Published
20 July 2025
Timestamp
0:18:36 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps; 'published' is the date listed by the archive. Passage read in context.

Scientific assessment

Unclear / insufficient evidence – The data do not allow an assessment either way.

Certainty of evidence: very low – Any assessment is very uncertain.

1. What was claimed?

Cattle are injected with hormones and antibiotics for fattening.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

Hormonal growth promoters have been used in cattle in some countries; the EU found it necessary to prohibit them (I-RES-02). Antibiotics were used as growth promoters until banned in the EU in 2006 (I-RES-04).

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

For the EU the claim is not applicable: hormones for growth promotion are prohibited (I-RES-02); vet-drug residue non-compliance was 0.11% (I-RES-07). For Egypt, the extent is undocumented in the literature read; the single Egyptian hormone-residue study (I-RES-09) has major methodological limits.

4. What remains unclear?

Prevalence of illegal anabolic use in Egyptian cattle.

5. Which studies support it?

I-RES-09 (weak).

6. Which studies contradict it?

I-RES-02, I-RES-04, I-RES-07 (EU).

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

Not applicable to legal EU production.

8. What is known about Egypt?

Data lacking; I-RES-09 calls for monitoring because no national limits are set.

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

Data gap for Egypt; not a demonstrated health effect.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

No peer-reviewed data on boldenone or other anabolic steroid residues in Egyptian beef were found in PubMed; one Egyptian ELISA study (n=56 beef, 92 chicken) reported estradiol and testosterone levels it judged above acceptable intakes, but ELISA cannot distinguish natural hormones from administered ones and the study is small.

Source quality

Anecdotal, leading questions to a guest.

Regional transferability

In the EU, hormonal growth promoters are prohibited (Directive 96/22/EC) and antibiotic growth promoters were banned from 1 January 2006 (Reg. 1831/2003).

Regional scope of the claim
refers to Egypt
Last reviewed
25 October 2026 provisional

In plain language

Dr Elawady says cattle are injected with male hormones and antibiotics to make them grow. In the EU, hormones for fattening are banned, and antibiotics as growth promoters have been banned since 2006. For Egypt, almost no reliable data exist. One small Egyptian study reported high hormone levels in meat, but its method cannot tell natural hormones from added ones.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (1)

  • Hormones in Egyptian meat (ELISA)

    Kamaly HF & Sharkawy AA. Food Chem Toxicol 2023 · PMID 37956705 · DOI 10.1016/j.fct.2023.114172
    Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    A small study reported high hormone levels, but its method cannot tell natural from added hormones.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Measure hormones.

    How was the study done?

    ELISA.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    148 samples.

    What was actually found?

    High estimated intake.

    How large was the observed effect?

    HI > 1.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Data gap in Egypt.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Weak method.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Unclear.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Low.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Illegal use.

    Scientific details →

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (3)

  • EU hormone ban in livestock

    Council of the EU. Official Journal of the EC 1996
    Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    The EU prohibits hormonal growth promoters in farm animals.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Ban hormones.

    How was the study done?

    Directive.

    What was actually found?

    Prohibition.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    No legal hormone fattening in EU.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Title only read.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts claim for EU.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High.

    Scientific details →

  • EU ban on antibiotic growth promoters

    European Parliament and Council. Official Journal of the EU 2003
    Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    Since 1 January 2006, antibiotics may not be used as growth promoters in EU animal feed.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Ban growth promoters.

    How was the study done?

    Regulation.

    What was actually found?

    Ban from 2006.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    No legal antibiotic fattening in EU.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Context.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High.

    Scientific details →

  • EU veterinary drug residues 2023

    EFSA. EFSA news 2025
    Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    Only 0.11% of over half a million samples were non-compliant.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Monitor vet residues.

    How was the study done?

    EU plans.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    548,194 samples.

    What was actually found?

    0.11% non-compliant.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Rare violations in EU.

    What are the study's limitations?

    News page only.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts 'contaminated meat' for EU.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High.

    Scientific details →

Studies with mixed or unclear results (0)

No studies in this group.

Regional context

Germany / EU

Not applicable to legal EU production.

Egypt

Data lacking; I-RES-09 calls for monitoring because no national limits are set.

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

Unclear / insufficient evidence Not applicable to the EU; unverified for Egypt.

The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:

  • Pesticides and pesticide residues
  • Veterinary medicines and antibiotics
  • Hormonal growth promoters
  • Contaminants (heavy metals, PFAS, PCBs, dioxins, nitrate)
  • Pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, etc.)

Eggs · Poultry · Dairy · Fish and seafood · Red meat · Fruit and vegetables

Choose a country to see the checked information for it.

Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.

Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country

References

  1. Hormonal residues in chicken and cattle meat: A risk threat the present and future consumer health.. Kamaly HF & Sharkawy AA. Food Chem Toxicol 2023 · PMID 37956705 · DOI 10.1016/j.fct.2023.114172
  2. Council Directive 96/22/EC concerning the prohibition on the use in stockfarming of certain substances having a hormonal or thyrostatic action and of beta-agonists. Council of the EU. Official Journal of the EC 1996
  3. Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition, Article 11. European Parliament and Council. Official Journal of the EU 2003
  4. Report for 2023 on the results from the monitoring of veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances in live animals and animal products (EFSA news: 'Veterinary drug residues in food - non-compliance stays low in 2023'). EFSA. EFSA news 2025

← Back to overview