Beef cattle are injected with hormones (testosterone/androgens, 'Boldex' - presumably boldenone) and antibiotics to fatten them, so the meat is 'injected'.
Original statement
بتحنوا العجول ايه تتخنها كده اندروجين صح بتحنوها هرمونات تستسترون ذكوره صح
verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.
Translation
Beef cattle are injected with hormones (testosterone/androgens, 'Boldex' - presumably boldenone) and antibiotics to fatten them, so the meat is 'injected'.
Origin
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! مصدر الغذاء الوريد البابي (Open source)
- Published
- 27 July 2025
- Timestamp
- 0:49:58 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Elawady asks a guest (named as a cattle-farm owner) leading questions; 'بتحنوا' is a likely transcription of 'بتحقنوا' (you inject).
- Claimed mechanism
Anabolic steroids and antibiotics as growth promoters.
- Claimed health effect
Contaminated meat.
- Population concerned
Consumers (Egypt)
- Geographic restriction by Elawady
Speaks about local practice; no explicit restriction.
Diverging source versions
اللحمه البقري فيها مشكله يا شيري جرجس ما انا هتكلم عن اللحمه دلوقتي لان انا محقونه حاجه اسمها بولدكس
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الأكل وراء كل مشاكلك (Open source)
- Published
- 20 July 2025
- Timestamp
- 0:18:36 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps; 'published' is the date listed by the archive. Passage read in context.
Scientific assessment
Unclear / insufficient evidence – The data do not allow an assessment either way.
Certainty of evidence: very low – Any assessment is very uncertain.
1. What was claimed?
Cattle are injected with hormones and antibiotics for fattening.
2. What is demonstrably correct?
Hormonal growth promoters have been used in cattle in some countries; the EU found it necessary to prohibit them (I-RES-02). Antibiotics were used as growth promoters until banned in the EU in 2006 (I-RES-04).
3. What is wrong or exaggerated?
For the EU the claim is not applicable: hormones for growth promotion are prohibited (I-RES-02); vet-drug residue non-compliance was 0.11% (I-RES-07). For Egypt, the extent is undocumented in the literature read; the single Egyptian hormone-residue study (I-RES-09) has major methodological limits.
4. What remains unclear?
Prevalence of illegal anabolic use in Egyptian cattle.
5. Which studies support it?
I-RES-09 (weak).
6. Which studies contradict it?
I-RES-02, I-RES-04, I-RES-07 (EU).
7. What applies to Germany and Europe?
Not applicable to legal EU production.
8. What is known about Egypt?
Data lacking; I-RES-09 calls for monitoring because no national limits are set.
9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?
Data gap for Egypt; not a demonstrated health effect.
Assessment details
- Rationale for certainty of evidence
No peer-reviewed data on boldenone or other anabolic steroid residues in Egyptian beef were found in PubMed; one Egyptian ELISA study (n=56 beef, 92 chicken) reported estradiol and testosterone levels it judged above acceptable intakes, but ELISA cannot distinguish natural hormones from administered ones and the study is small.
- Source quality
Anecdotal, leading questions to a guest.
- Regional transferability
In the EU, hormonal growth promoters are prohibited (Directive 96/22/EC) and antibiotic growth promoters were banned from 1 January 2006 (Reg. 1831/2003).
- Regional scope of the claim
- refers to Egypt
- Last reviewed
- 25 October 2026 provisional
In plain language
Dr Elawady says cattle are injected with male hormones and antibiotics to make them grow. In the EU, hormones for fattening are banned, and antibiotics as growth promoters have been banned since 2006. For Egypt, almost no reliable data exist. One small Egyptian study reported high hormone levels in meat, but its method cannot tell natural hormones from added ones.
Studies on this claim
Studies supporting the claim (1)
-
Hormones in Egyptian meat (ELISA)
Kamaly HF & Sharkawy AA. Food Chem Toxicol 2023 · PMID 37956705 · DOI 10.1016/j.fct.2023.114172Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checkedA small study reported high hormone levels, but its method cannot tell natural from added hormones.
Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Measure hormones.
- How was the study done?
ELISA.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
148 samples.
- What was actually found?
High estimated intake.
- How large was the observed effect?
HI > 1.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Data gap in Egypt.
- What are the study's limitations?
Weak method.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Unclear.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Low.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Illegal use.
No study in this group is marked as key.
Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (3)
-
EU hormone ban in livestock
Council of the EU. Official Journal of the EC 1996Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checkedThe EU prohibits hormonal growth promoters in farm animals.
Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Ban hormones.
- How was the study done?
Directive.
- What was actually found?
Prohibition.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
No legal hormone fattening in EU.
- What are the study's limitations?
Title only read.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts claim for EU.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
High.
-
EU ban on antibiotic growth promoters
European Parliament and Council. Official Journal of the EU 2003Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checkedSince 1 January 2006, antibiotics may not be used as growth promoters in EU animal feed.
Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Ban growth promoters.
- How was the study done?
Regulation.
- What was actually found?
Ban from 2006.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
No legal antibiotic fattening in EU.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Context.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
High.
-
EU veterinary drug residues 2023
EFSA. EFSA news 2025Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checkedOnly 0.11% of over half a million samples were non-compliant.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Monitor vet residues.
- How was the study done?
EU plans.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
548,194 samples.
- What was actually found?
0.11% non-compliant.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Rare violations in EU.
- What are the study's limitations?
News page only.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts 'contaminated meat' for EU.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
High.
No study in this group is marked as key.
Studies with mixed or unclear results (0)
No studies in this group.
Regional context
Germany / EU
Not applicable to legal EU production.
Egypt
Data lacking; I-RES-09 calls for monitoring because no national limits are set.
- Food-safety governance and official controls
- Pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables on the EU/German market (incl. imports from Egypt)
- Pesticide residues in produce sold on the Egyptian domestic market
- Antibiotic (veterinary drug) residues in poultry meat and eggs
- Antimicrobial use in food animals and antibiotic growth promoters
- Hormones in poultry, meat, milk and farmed fish
- Dioxins, PCBs and PFAS in eggs and other animal foods
- Aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products
- Aflatoxins in groundnuts (peanuts)
- Heavy metals in fish
- Farmed fish (aquaculture): drugs, water source and controls
- Import controls and the meaning of RASFF notifications for Egyptian products
What applies in my country?
General scientific assessment
Unclear / insufficient evidence Not applicable to the EU; unverified for Egypt.
The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:
- Pesticides and pesticide residues
- Veterinary medicines and antibiotics
- Hormonal growth promoters
- Contaminants (heavy metals, PFAS, PCBs, dioxins, nitrate)
- Pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, etc.)
Eggs · Poultry · Dairy · Fish and seafood · Red meat · Fruit and vegetables
Choose a country to see the checked information for it.
Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.
Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country
References
- Hormonal residues in chicken and cattle meat: A risk threat the present and future consumer health.. Kamaly HF & Sharkawy AA. Food Chem Toxicol 2023 · PMID 37956705 · DOI 10.1016/j.fct.2023.114172
- Council Directive 96/22/EC concerning the prohibition on the use in stockfarming of certain substances having a hormonal or thyrostatic action and of beta-agonists. Council of the EU. Official Journal of the EC 1996
- Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition, Article 11. European Parliament and Council. Official Journal of the EU 2003
- Report for 2023 on the results from the monitoring of veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances in live animals and animal products (EFSA news: 'Veterinary drug residues in food - non-compliance stays low in 2023'). EFSA. EFSA news 2025