Cross-sectional studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-INS-109 in-depth review

Why people with diabetes end up in hospital with ketoacidosis again and again

Recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis in inner-city minority patients: behavioral, socioeconomic, and psychosocial factors.

Overview

Randall L et al.. Diabetes Care 2011 · PMID 21775761 · DOI 10.2337/dc11-0701

In 164 adults admitted with ketoacidosis, stopping insulin was the main trigger in 68%.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Find the drivers of recurrent DKA.

How was the study done?

Bedside interviews.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

164 adults.

What was actually found?

Insulin stopped in 68%.

How large was the observed effect?

68% (about 60-74%).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Stopping insulin is dangerous.

What are the study's limitations?

Single centre.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts insulin-free management of DKA.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Mechanism universal.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot give population incidence.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Randall L et al.
Journal
Diabetes Care
Year
2011
Identifier
PMID 21775761 DOI 10.2337/dc11-0701
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

NIH grants (record).

2. Research question

What drives insulin non-adherence in recurrent DKA?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cross-sectional study – Bedside cross-sectional study of consecutive admitted DKA patients
Population

Adults admitted with DKA to Grady Hospital

Country

USA (Atlanta)

Period

2007-2010

Sample size

164

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Adults with DKA admission

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Socioeconomic/psychological factors

Comparator

First-time vs recurrent DKA

Endpoints

Precipitating causes; factors for recurrence

Statistical methods

Group comparisons

5. Actual results

Results

Insulin discontinuation was the leading cause in 68% of patients; other causes: new-onset diabetes 10%, infection 15%, medical illness 4%, undetermined 3%. Reasons for stopping: no reason 32%, lack of money 27%, felt sick 19%, away from supply 15%, stretching insulin 5%.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Poor adherence to insulin therapy is the leading cause of recurrent DKA.

6. Strengths

  • Consecutive bedside data
  • Replicates Musey 1995

7. Weaknesses

  • Single centre
  • Specific population

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Descriptive.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

68% (Wilson 95% CI about 60-74%, count reconstructed; stats/C-INS-08_insulin_omission_and_fluids.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Stopping insulin, including when 'feeling sick', is the main cause of DKA.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Directly applicable; same biology and clinical standards in Europe.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Consistent with Musey 1995 and with guideline statements on insulin omission.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks