椰枣、葡萄、无花果和芒果等甜味水果不必避免；传统饮食错误地限制了它们，并推崇味道寡淡的水果。
原始表述
ده حتى اما سمحوا بالفاكهه كانوا بيدوروا على فاكهه طعمها ماسخ ... يقول لك لا تاكل بلح ولا عنب ولا تين ولا مانجا امالكل ايه يا باشا؟ ا بطيخ
按来源为原话. 译文由本项目提供；以阿拉伯语原文为准。
译文
椰枣、葡萄、无花果和芒果等甜味水果不必避免；传统饮食错误地限制了它们，并推崇味道寡淡的水果。
出处
- 来源状态
- 视频转录文本（本人原话）
- 归属
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- 视频
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الدم -١- (打开来源)
- 发布日期
- 2025年8月11日
- 时间戳
- 0:41:07 (在原视频 YouTube 自动字幕轨中的位置；可确认该内容出现的位置，但不能确认说话人是谁)
- 归属的不确定性
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
- 所声称的机制
Sweet taste is natural; sugar is not harmful (broader system view).
- 所声称的健康影响
No harm from sweet fruits.
- 涉及人群
Everyone, including people with diabetes (implied).
- Elawady 设定的地域限制
none found
来源版本存在差异
- 来源状态
- 档案网站食物清单
- 归属
- Archive food list (eltayebat.com)
- 出处
- https://eltayebat.com/foods/
- 归属的不确定性
- eltayebat.com: 'العنب والتين والتمر ✅ مسموح'; 'العسل والمربى ✅'; 'الحلاوة الطحينية والتمر ✅'.
- 来源状态
- 视频转录文本（本人原话）
- 归属
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- 视频
- بدأت قناة ＂Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي＂ بثًا مباشرًاFAQs (打开来源)
- 发布日期
- 2026年4月6日
- 时间戳
- 无（转录文本不含时间信息）
- 归属的不确定性
- Machine transcript: Elawady also advises not to eat many dates ('التمر برده ما تاكلش تمر كتير ... ثلاث تمرات في اليوم خمسه').
科学评估
基本正确 – 核心内容正确，但有局限或细微不准确之处。
证据确定性: 中 – 进一步研究仍可能影响该评估。
1. 说法是什么？
Sweet whole fruits are not to be feared.
2. 哪些内容可证实是正确的？
Whole fruits, including sweet ones like grapes, are associated with lower or neutral T2D risk; dates have a low-to-medium GI.
3. 哪些内容是错误或夸大的？
Generalising to 'sweet things are not harmful' (honey, sugar, juices) is not supported; free sugars should be limited (I-FRU-06).
4. 哪些内容仍不明确？
Optimal date portions for people with diabetes. The date study (I-FRU-04) tested only 10 well-controlled people with T2D (mean HbA1c 6.6%, diet or metformin), single servings in non-randomised order, with a 50 g carbohydrate portion (about 7-10 dates) whose high glycaemic load was not reported; it does not cover insulin-treated or poorly controlled diabetes and does not support unrestricted intake.
5. 哪些研究支持该说法？
I-FRU-01, I-FRU-03, I-FRU-04; Christensen 2013 RCT (I-FRU-105: advice to restrict fruit did not improve HbA1c in newly diagnosed T2D, difference 0.19%, -0.23 to 0.62); China Kadoorie Biobank (I-FRU-106: daily fruit HR 0.88 for diabetes; in people with diabetes, mortality HR 0.83 per 100 g/day); Butler 2022 RCT (I-FRU-107: 60 g dates/day for 12 weeks did not worsen HbA1c); ADA Standards 2026 recommend whole fruits (I-INTC-03).
6. 哪些研究与该说法相矛盾？
I-FRU-06 (for free sugars, not whole fruit); AlGeffari 2016 (I-FRU-108: date GL ranges from 8.5 to 24 per portion, so portions matter).
7. 对德国和欧洲而言情况如何？
Consistent with '5 a day' fruit and vegetable advice.
8. 关于埃及的已知情况是什么？
Dates are culturally important, e.g., during Ramadan.
9. 合理的实际结论是什么？
正常分量的完整甜味水果没有问题；但这不适用于果汁、蜂蜜或添加糖。
评估详情
- 证据确定性的依据
For the general population, whole fruits including grapes are associated with lower T2D risk (I-FRU-01, I-FRU-03); dates have low-to-medium GI (46-55) and did not cause large glucose excursions in a small study of well-controlled T2D (I-FRU-04). Downgraded to MOSTLY_TRUE because portion size still matters for people with diabetes (dates are carbohydrate-dense), and because the broader framing that sugar is harmless is not supported (I-FRU-06).
- 来源质量
Live-stream statement.
- 地区可推广性
Universal; dates are a regional staple.
- 个体例外情况
People with diabetes need to account for the carbohydrate in dates, dried fruit and honey.
- 说法的地域范围
- 普遍性（生物学/医学）
- 最近审核
- 2026年10月26日 初步
科学证据详解
仅在特定条件下成立 – 该说法仅在特定剂量、特定人群、特定制备方式或特定情况下成立。
研究问题: In the general population and in people with type 2 diabetes, does eating sweet whole fruits (dates, grapes, figs, mango) worsen glycaemic control or diabetes risk compared with restricting them?
研究问题详解 (PICO)
- 人群
- General population; people with type 2 diabetes
- 干预或暴露
- Eating sweet whole fruits in usual portions
- 对照
- Restricting sweet fruit
- 地域范围
- universal biology; dates culturally central in Egypt and the Gulf
- 结局指标
- HbA1c
- Incident T2D
- Mortality and complications in diabetes
研究结果按作者报告呈现。我们的评估见下文。
哪些证据支持该说法？
Should people with type 2 diabetes cut down on fruit?
RCT: advising people with new T2D to restrict fruit did not improve HbA1c.
- 实际结果
- HbA1c difference 0.19% (-0.23 to 0.62); no weight difference.
- 方法学质量
- moderate (small RCT)
- 相关性
- direct
- 局限
- 12 weeks; n=63; open-label.
Fresh fruit and diabetes in half a million Chinese adults
Higher fresh fruit intake associated with lower diabetes risk and, in diabetes, lower mortality and complications.
- 实际结果
- Incident diabetes HR 0.88 (0.83-0.93); mortality in diabetes HR 0.83 (0.74-0.93) per 100 g/d.
- 方法学质量
- high (very large cohort)
- 相关性
- direct
- 局限
- Observational.
Fruits, vegetables and diabetes
Halvorsen RE et al.. BMJ Nutr Prev Health 2021 · PMID 35028521 · DOI 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218 Meta分析全文，含结构化偏倚风险评估Fruit, including grapes, associated with lower T2D risk.
- 实际结果
- Fruit RR 0.93 (0.90-0.97); grapes/raisins 0.74 (0.66-0.83) per 50 g.
- 方法学质量
- moderate
- 相关性
- direct
- 局限
- Observational.
哪些证据不支持该说法？
Glycaemic index of 17 date varieties
Some date varieties have a high glycaemic load per 50 g carbohydrate portion.
- 实际结果
- GI 42.8-74.6; GL 8.5-24.
- 方法学质量
- moderate
- 相关性
- indirect (healthy volunteers)
- 局限
- Portion caveat rather than harm.
WHO limit on free sugars
World Health Organization. WHO (web) 2015 指南 / 立场声明已核查摘要WHO: free sugars (including fruit juices and honey) should be limited.
- 实际结果
- <10% of energy, ideally <5%.
- 方法学质量
- guideline
- 相关性
- indirect (not whole fruit)
- 局限
- Applies to juices/honey, not whole fruit.
总体证据说明了什么？
基于上述研究的编辑评估——其本身并非研究结果。
哪种观点有更好的证据支持？
Whole sweet fruits are compatible with good health and with diabetes care in normal portions; restricting them is not supported. This does not extend to juices, honey or added sugar.
为什么有些研究权重更大
A direct RCT and very large cohorts outweigh GI data; GI/GL data matter for portion advice.
因果关系是否已确立？ 有可能，尚未确立 RCTs show no harm on HbA1c; cohort benefits may be partly confounded.
仍存在的不确定性
Large portions of dates or dried fruit in insulin-treated or poorly controlled diabetes.
合理的结论
Elawady's criticism of fruit restriction is fair for whole fruit; people with diabetes still need to count carbohydrate from dates and dried fruit.
为什么研究结果看起来互相矛盾？
GI/GL measurements (some dates high GL) and outcome studies (no harm) answer different questions: acute glycaemic response per portion vs long-term outcomes with usual intake.
这是否取决于国家？
- 一般生物学效应
- Universal.
- 饮食习惯
- Dates are central during Ramadan; large portions are common.
- 食品原产地
- Date variety affects GL (I-FRU-108).
- 污染物
- Not applicable.
- 本国生产条件
- Not applicable.
- 法律规则
- Not applicable.
- 实际监测数据
- Not applicable.
足以改变结论的地区差异没有可靠数据支持。
统计复核
- Log-symmetry and absolute risk – CIs log-symmetric; 0.2% absolute 5-y difference for incident diabetes (small). 已重新计算
- CI internal consistency – Midpoint 0.195 vs reported 0.19; upper limit 0.62% shows imprecision. 已重新计算
总体证据的确定性（GRADE，简化版）
- 主要结局
- Glycaemic control (HbA1c) with unrestricted whole fruit in T2D
- 起始等级
- 高（随机试验）
- 降级理由
- imprecision (small RCT)
- risk of bias (open-label)
- 结果
- 低
由单名审查者参照 GRADE 方法进行的简化评估；并非正式的 GRADE 专家组评估。GRADE 评价的是针对某一结局的整体证据，而非单项研究。
已核查的临床指南和官方声明
- ADA: 5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026 (registered as I-INTC-03) (2026) · 原始文献
Eating patterns should emphasise whole fruits, legumes and other minimally processed high-fibre carbohydrate sources; replace sugar-sweetened beverages (including juices) with water or low/no-calorie beverages; minimise added sugar; incorporate plant protein such as legumes. - WHO: Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children (news release registered as I-FRU-06) (2015) · 原始文献
Free sugars below 10% of energy, ideally below 5%; free sugars include sugars naturally present in fruit juices; sugars in whole fresh fruit are not free sugars. (Content as recorded for I-FRU-06; not re-fetched in this phase.)
检索策略
本次审查的文献检索记录（检索式采用原数据库语法）。
| 数据库 | 日期 | 检索式 | 检索目标 | 命中数 | 纳入数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PubMed | 2026年10月26日 | (fruit[ti]) AND (type 2 diabetes[ti]) AND (randomized[tiab] OR randomised[tiab]) AND (HbA1c[tiab] OR glycemic control[tiab] OR glycaemic control[tiab]) | 支持性证据 | 7 | |
| PubMed | 2026年10月26日 | fresh fruit[ti] AND diabetes[ti] AND (China[tiab] OR Chinese[tiab]) AND cohort[tiab] | 支持性证据 | 2 | |
| Europe PMC | 2026年10月26日 | (TITLE:fruit) AND (TITLE:diabetes) AND ("people with diabetes" OR "patients with type 2 diabetes" OR "diabetic") AND (trial OR cohort) | 支持性证据 | 50 | |
| PubMed | 2026年10月26日 | (date fruit*[tiab] OR dates[ti] OR Phoenix dactylifera[tiab]) AND (glycemic[tiab] OR glycaemic[tiab] OR diabetes[tiab]) AND (systematic review[tiab] OR meta-analysis[tiab] OR randomized[tiab] OR trial[tiab]) | 双向 | 13 | |
| Europe PMC | 2026年10月26日 | (TITLE:dates OR TITLE:"date fruit" OR TITLE:"Phoenix dactylifera") AND (TITLE:diabetes OR TITLE:glycemic OR TITLE:glycaemic) | 双向 | 24 | |
| PubMed | 2026年10月26日 | (grape*[ti] OR mango[ti] OR fig[ti] OR figs[ti] OR dried fruit*[ti]) AND (diabetes[ti] OR glycemic[ti] OR glycaemic[ti] OR glucose[ti]) AND (meta-analysis[tiab] OR cohort[tiab] OR randomized[tiab]) | 双向 | 15 | |
| PubMed | 2026年10月26日 | Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026[ti] AND (Positive Health Behaviors[ti] OR Lifestyle[ti]) | 指南 | 1 |
待解决的问题
Date portions for insulin-treated patients.
核查深度如何？
8 项相关研究：3 项核查了全文（其中 2 项进行了结构化偏倚风险评估），5 项基于摘要核查，0 项仅核查了文献信息。 尚未进行由两名独立审查者完成的正式评估，也尚未进行独立的人类专家审核。
最近一次科学审核: 2026年10月26日
评定结论的变更历史
- 2026年10月25日 · 第 1 阶段 · 初始评估: 基本正确 (中)
- 2026年10月26日 · 第 4 阶段（系统证据审查） · 在扩展证据后重新审查；评定结论不变: 基本正确 (中)
New RCT (I-FRU-105, I-FRU-107) and cohort (I-FRU-106) evidence supports the existing rating; the portion caveat (I-FRU-108) and the free-sugar limit keep it at MOSTLY_TRUE.
新来源: I-FRU-105 I-FRU-106 I-FRU-107 I-FRU-108
通俗解释
Diaa 医生批评了禁止吃椰枣、葡萄、无花果和芒果的饮食。研究部分支持他的看法：完整水果（包括葡萄）与较低的糖尿病风险相关，而椰枣对血糖的升高作用也没有许多人想象的那么大。糖尿病患者仍需注意分量。果汁、蜂蜜和添加糖则是另一回事，应当加以限制。
与该说法相关的研究
支持该说法的研究 (6)
-
Which fruits are linked to diabetes?
Muraki I et al.. BMJ 2013 · PMID 23990623 · DOI 10.1136/bmj.f5001队列研究独立交叉核查已核查全文★ 关键研究Blueberries, grapes and apples linked to lower diabetes risk; juice and cantaloupe to slightly higher risk; glycaemic load did not explain the differences.
Grapes etc.
该研究是否支持这一具体说法？ 部分支持 · 方法学质量: 高 · 证据确定性：见该说法的总体评估
研究通俗解读
- 研究人员想了解什么？
Fruits and diabetes
- 研究是如何开展的？
Three cohorts
- 研究了多少人、动物或样本？
187,382
- 实际发现了什么？
Whole fruits mostly protective; juice harmful
- 观察到的效应有多大？
Juice HR 1.08; grapes 0.88; cantaloupe 1.10
- 研究结果对日常生活意味着什么？
Eat whole fruit rather than juice
- 该研究有哪些局限？
Observational; US
- 它对 Elawady 的具体说法说明了什么？
Undermines GL argument for melon ban; supports whole fruit over juice
- 研究结果是否适用于德国和欧洲？
Moderate
- 从该研究中明确不能得出什么结论？
Causation; watermelon specifically
-
Fruits, vegetables and diabetes
Halvorsen RE et al.. BMJ Nutr Prev Health 2021 · PMID 35028521 · DOI 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218Meta分析独立交叉核查全文，含结构化偏倚风险评估Eating more fruit was linked to about 7% lower diabetes risk. Grapes/raisins and apples looked favourable; cantaloupe and sweetened fruit drinks were linked to higher risk, but in very few studies. 100% fruit juice showed no clear link.
该研究是否支持这一具体说法？ 部分支持 · 方法学质量: 中 · 证据确定性：见该说法的总体评估
研究通俗解读
- 研究人员想了解什么？
F&V and diabetes
- 研究是如何开展的？
Meta-analysis
- 研究了多少人、动物或样本？
23 cohorts
- 实际发现了什么？
Weak inverse
- 观察到的效应有多大？
RR 0.93
- 研究结果对日常生活意味着什么？
Whole fruit good
- 该研究有哪些局限？
Few studies per fruit type, mostly the same US cohorts; no registered protocol; observational
- 它对 Elawady 的具体说法说明了什么？
Mixed: weak, few-study signal for cantaloupe; favourable for grapes; sweetened fruit drinks (nectars) linked to higher risk
- 研究结果是否适用于德国和欧洲？
Moderate
- 从该研究中明确不能得出什么结论？
Cause
-
Glycaemic index of dates
Alkaabi JM et al.. Nutr J 2011 · PMID 21619670 · DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-59其他独立交叉核查全文，含结构化偏倚风险评估Five date varieties had GI 46-55.
该研究是否支持这一具体说法？ 部分支持 · 方法学质量: 中 · 证据确定性：见该说法的总体评估
研究通俗解读
- 研究人员想了解什么？
Dates GI
- 研究是如何开展的？
Feeding test
- 研究了多少人、动物或样本？
23
- 实际发现了什么？
Low GI
- 观察到的效应有多大？
GI ~46-55
- 研究结果对日常生活意味着什么？
Dates in moderation acceptable
- 该研究有哪些局限？
Very small; order not randomised; only well-controlled diabetes; one-off servings
- 它对 Elawady 的具体说法说明了什么？
Supports dates in moderation
- 研究结果是否适用于德国和欧洲？
Moderate
- 从该研究中明确不能得出什么结论？
Cannot show that large or unrestricted date portions are safe for people with diabetes
-
Should people with type 2 diabetes cut down on fruit?
Christensen AS et al.. Nutr J 2013 · PMID 23497350 · DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-29随机对照试验独立交叉核查已核查摘要★ 关键研究Telling newly diagnosed patients to eat less fruit did not improve their blood sugar, weight or waist.
Restricting fruit did not improve HbA1c.
该研究是否支持这一具体说法？ 是 · 方法学质量: 中 · 证据确定性：见该说法的总体评估
研究通俗解读
- 研究人员想了解什么？
Test fruit restriction advice.
- 研究是如何开展的？
RCT, 12 weeks.
- 研究了多少人、动物或样本？
63 adults with new T2D.
- 实际发现了什么？
No HbA1c difference.
- 观察到的效应有多大？
0.19% (-0.23 to 0.62).
- 研究结果对日常生活意味着什么？
Whole fruit can stay in the diet of people with type 2 diabetes.
- 该研究有哪些局限？
Small, short, open.
- 它对 Elawady 的具体说法说明了什么？
Supports C-FRU-05.
- 研究结果是否适用于德国和欧洲？
Applicable.
- 从该研究中明确不能得出什么结论？
It does not cover juices or insulin users.
-
Fresh fruit and diabetes in half a million Chinese adults
Du H et al.. PLoS Med 2017 · PMID 28399126 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002279队列研究独立交叉核查已核查摘要★ 关键研究Daily fruit eaters had a 12% lower diabetes risk, and people with diabetes who ate more fruit had fewer deaths and complications.
Fruit associated with lower diabetes risk and lower mortality in diabetes.
该研究是否支持这一具体说法？ 是 · 方法学质量: 高 · 证据确定性：见该说法的总体评估
研究通俗解读
- 研究人员想了解什么？
Study fruit and diabetes outcomes.
- 研究是如何开展的？
Large cohort.
- 研究了多少人、动物或样本？
~0.5 million adults.
- 实际发现了什么？
Lower risks with more fruit.
- 观察到的效应有多大？
HR 0.88; mortality HR 0.83 per 100 g/d.
- 研究结果对日常生活意味着什么？
Whole fruit fits a diet for people with or at risk of diabetes.
- 该研究有哪些局限？
Observational.
- 它对 Elawady 的具体说法说明了什么？
Supports C-FRU-05.
- 研究结果是否适用于德国和欧洲？
Plausible.
- 从该研究中明确不能得出什么结论？
It cannot prove that fruit causes the lower risk.
-
Dates and blood sugar in type 2 diabetes
Butler AE et al.. Nutrients 2022 · PMID 36079749 · DOI 10.3390/nu14173491随机对照试验独立交叉核查已核查摘要Eating 60 g of dates a day for 12 weeks did not worsen blood sugar control in people with type 2 diabetes.
60 g dates/day for 12 weeks did not worsen HbA1c.
该研究是否支持这一具体说法？ 是 · 方法学质量: 中 · 证据确定性：见该说法的总体评估
研究通俗解读
- 研究人员想了解什么？
Test dates in T2D.
- 研究是如何开展的？
Randomised trial vs raisins.
- 研究了多少人、动物或样本？
61 completers.
- 实际发现了什么？
No change in HbA1c.
- 观察到的效应有多大？
Not significant.
- 研究结果对日常生活意味着什么？
A moderate portion of dates is compatible with diabetes care.
- 该研究有哪些局限？
Dropouts; no fruit-free group.
- 它对 Elawady 的具体说法说明了什么？
Supports C-FRU-05 with portion caveat.
- 研究结果是否适用于德国和欧洲？
Applicable.
- 从该研究中明确不能得出什么结论？
It does not show that unlimited dates are safe.
该组中没有被标记为关键研究的研究。
与该说法相矛盾或限制该说法的研究 (0)
该组中没有研究。
结果不一或不明确的研究 (2)
-
WHO limit on free sugars
World Health Organization. WHO (web) 2015指南 / 立场声明独立交叉核查已核查摘要WHO advises less than 10% of energy from free sugars, which include fruit juice and honey but not whole fruit.
Applies to juice/honey, not whole fruit.
该研究是否支持这一具体说法？ 否 · 方法学质量: 高 · 证据确定性：见该说法的总体评估
研究通俗解读
- 研究人员想了解什么？
Sugars guideline
- 研究是如何开展的？
Guideline
- 实际发现了什么？
<10% energy
- 研究结果对日常生活意味着什么？
Limit juice, honey, added sugar; whole fruit fine
- 该研究有哪些局限？
Press release only
- 它对 Elawady 的具体说法说明了什么？
Contradicts free use of juices
- 研究结果是否适用于德国和欧洲？
Directly
-
Glycaemic index of 17 date varieties
AlGeffari MA et al.. Ann Saudi Med 2016 · PMID 27920411 · DOI 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.397其他独立交叉核查已核查摘要Dates had an average glycaemic index of 55, but the glycaemic load ranged from 8.5 to 24 depending on the variety.
Date GI 43-75; GL up to 24 depending on variety.
该研究是否支持这一具体说法？ 部分支持 · 方法学质量: 中 · 证据确定性：见该说法的总体评估
研究通俗解读
- 研究人员想了解什么？
Measure date GI/GL.
- 研究是如何开展的？
GI test.
- 研究了多少人、动物或样本？
19 healthy adults.
- 实际发现了什么？
GI 43-75; GL 8.5-24.
- 观察到的效应有多大？
Mean GI 55.2.
- 研究结果对日常生活意味着什么？
Dates are not 'sugar bombs', but portions count.
- 该研究有哪些局限？
Healthy volunteers.
- 它对 Elawady 的具体说法说明了什么？
Supports the portion caveat in C-FRU-05.
- 研究结果是否适用于德国和欧洲？
Applicable.
- 从该研究中明确不能得出什么结论？
It does not test long-term effects.
该组中没有被标记为关键研究的研究。
地区背景
德国 / 欧盟
Consistent with '5 a day' fruit and vegetable advice.
埃及
Dates are culturally important, e.g., during Ramadan.
在我的国家适用什么？
一般科学评估
基本正确 完整的甜味水果与良好健康并不冲突；这是一个合理的观点，只要不把它延伸到果汁和添加糖。
以下食品安全领域与该说法相关：
- 农药与农药残留
- 污染物（重金属、PFAS、PCB、二噁英、硝酸盐）
- 添加剂与加工
水果与蔬菜 · 蜂蜜、糖、甜食
选择一个国家，查看针对该国已核查的信息。
局限：法律规则描述的是允许什么，而不是每一种食品实际含有什么。检测数据来自样本，只有结合其方法细节才有意义。
参考文献
- Fruit consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from three prospective longitudinal cohort studies.. Muraki I et al.. BMJ 2013 · PMID 23990623 · DOI 10.1136/bmj.f5001
- Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.. Halvorsen RE et al.. BMJ Nutr Prev Health 2021 · PMID 35028521 · DOI 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218
- Glycemic indices of five varieties of dates in healthy and diabetic subjects.. Alkaabi JM et al.. Nutr J 2011 · PMID 21619670 · DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-59
- Effect of fruit restriction on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes--a randomized trial.. Christensen AS et al.. Nutr J 2013 · PMID 23497350 · DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-29
- Fresh fruit consumption in relation to incident diabetes and diabetic vascular complications: A 7-y prospective study of 0.5 million Chinese adults.. Du H et al.. PLoS Med 2017 · PMID 28399126 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002279
- Effect of Date Fruit Consumption on the Glycemic Control of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. Butler AE et al.. Nutrients 2022 · PMID 36079749 · DOI 10.3390/nu14173491
- WHO calls on countries to reduce sugars intake among adults and children (news release on WHO Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children, 2015).. World Health Organization. WHO (web) 2015
- Glycemic indices, glycemic load and glycemic response for seventeen varieties of dates grown in Saudi Arabia.. AlGeffari MA et al.. Ann Saudi Med 2016 · PMID 27920411 · DOI 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.397