Makan ayam menyebabkan mimpi buruk, serangan panik, halusinasi, dan gangguan psikologis pada anak-anak dan orang dewasa; serangan panik menjadi meluas dalam 20 tahun terakhir karena produksi ayam secara massal.
Pernyataan asli
الولاد بيجي لهم هلوسه هواجس ضلالات الكلام ده كله مرتبط ارتباط لصيق باكل الفراخ ما فيش حد بياكل كل فراخ وماش ما بيجيلوش بانك اتاكس نوبات الهلع كلها ومنتشره في اخر 20 سنه لان حصل ايه ماس برودكشن الفراخ
kata demi kata sesuai sumber. Terjemahan oleh proyek; rumusan bahasa Arab yang menjadi acuan.
Terjemahan
Makan ayam menyebabkan mimpi buruk, serangan panik, halusinasi, dan gangguan psikologis pada anak-anak dan orang dewasa; serangan panik menjadi meluas dalam 20 tahun terakhir karena produksi ayam secara massal.
Asal
- Status sumber
- Transkrip video (kata-katanya sendiri)
- Atribusi
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- أولي حلقات برنامج الحقيقه والسراب (Buka sumber)
- Dipublikasikan
- 30 Oktober 2025
- Penanda waktu
- 0:21:47 (lokasi dalam trek takarir otomatis YouTube dari video asli; memastikan di mana kata-kata itu muncul, bukan siapa yang berbicara)
- Ketidakpastian atribusi
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
- Mekanisme yang diklaim
Not specified.
- Efek kesehatan yang diklaim
Nightmares, panic attacks, hallucinations, delusions, obsessive thoughts, enuresis, stuttering.
- Populasi yang dimaksud
Children and adults
- Batasan geografis oleh Elawady
none found
Versi sumber yang berbeda
- Status sumber
- Kutipan arsip (tanpa keterangan lokasi)
- Atribusi
- Elawady (archive paraphrase; source video not given)
- Asal
- https://eltayebat.com/rule/industrial-chicken/
- Ketidakpastian atribusi
- The archive presents this in a 'د. ضياء يقول' box without a video reference; exact wording by Elawady not verified.
- Status sumber
- Transkrip video (kata-katanya sendiri)
- Atribusi
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- الجهاز العصبي و الاحساس بالألم؟ (Buka sumber)
- Dipublikasikan
- 9 Februari 2025
- Penanda waktu
- tidak tersedia (transkrip tidak memiliki penanda waktu)
- Ketidakpastian atribusi
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
- Status sumber
- Transkrip video (kata-katanya sendiri)
- Atribusi
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live!دردشة صباحية (Buka sumber)
- Dipublikasikan
- 10 Desember 2025
- Penanda waktu
- tidak tersedia (transkrip tidak memiliki penanda waktu)
- Ketidakpastian atribusi
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
نوبات الهلع دي والاحلام والكوابيس اعرف يا باشا ان هو داخلها فراخ على طول الشخصيه الم فراخ يا باشا فراخ وبيض على طول
These panic attacks, dreams and nightmares: know that chicken is involved, always ... chicken, chicken and eggs, always.
- Status sumber
- Transkrip video (kata-katanya sendiri)
- Atribusi
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr.D Clinics - Diaa Al Awady is live! الألم و الصداع (Buka sumber)
- Dipublikasikan
- 10 Februari 2025
- Penanda waktu
- 0:55:38 (lokasi dalam trek takarir otomatis YouTube dari video asli; memastikan di mana kata-kata itu muncul, bukan siapa yang berbicara)
- Ketidakpastian atribusi
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; wording may contain speech-recognition errors; speaker turns are not marked, the excerpt was judged to be Elawady's own speech from context.
- Status sumber
- Transkrip video (kata-katanya sendiri)
- Atribusi
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! (Buka sumber)
- Dipublikasikan
- 27 Agustus 2025
- Penanda waktu
- tidak tersedia (transkrip tidak memiliki penanda waktu)
- Ketidakpastian atribusi
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
Penilaian ilmiah
Sebagian besar salah – Bagian-bagian penting dari pernyataan ini tidak didukung oleh bukti atau sangat dilebih-lebihkan.
Tingkat kepastian bukti: rendah – Penelitian lebih lanjut kemungkinan besar akan mengubah penilaian secara bermakna.
1. Apa yang diklaim?
Chicken causes nightmares, panic attacks, hallucinations and other psychiatric symptoms; mass chicken production explains a rise of panic attacks.
2. Apa yang terbukti benar?
Gastrointestinal discomfort and late eating are associated with worse sleep and more nightmares in self-report surveys. Anxiety disorders have become more common: the Global Burden of Disease study found an increase in age-standardised prevalence of anxiety disorders between 1990 and 2023 (I-CHK-107), but it gives no evidence that chicken is a cause.
3. Apa yang salah atau dilebih-lebihkan?
No evidence links chicken specifically to nightmares, panic attacks or psychosis. In two surveys, people most often blamed dairy and sweets for disturbing dreams. Attributing a 20-year trend in panic attacks to chicken ignores many other factors (diagnosis, awareness, stress).
4. Apa yang masih belum jelas?
Not applicable beyond the general lack of studies.
5. Studi mana yang mendukungnya?
None found.
6. Studi mana yang membantahnya?
Indirect only: I-CHK-105 (3,362 Iranian adults: white meat intake not associated with anxiety, depression or distress); I-CHK-106 (meta-analysis: meat eaters had slightly lower anxiety and depression than meat abstainers); I-CHK-140 (WHO: anxiety disorders have social, psychological and biological causes, no food is named, and effective treatments exist); I-EGG-12, I-EGG-13 (foods blamed for dreams are mainly dairy and sweets).
7. Apa yang berlaku untuk Jerman dan Eropa?
Not region-specific.
8. Apa yang diketahui tentang Mesir?
Not region-specific.
9. Kesimpulan praktis apa yang tepat?
Serangan panik, halusinasi, dan mimpi buruk yang menetap memerlukan penilaian medis atau psikologis; berhenti makan ayam bukan pengobatan berbasis bukti.
Rincian penilaian
- Alasan tingkat kepastian bukti
No study was found linking chicken consumption to nightmares, panic disorder or psychosis. Food-and-dream surveys point to dairy and sweets as the foods most often blamed (I-EGG-12, I-EGG-13), but neither survey reports chicken separately (only 'meat', 13-16% of the few food mentions for disturbing dreams) and neither measured panic attacks or hallucinations, so this evidence is very indirect. The universal wording is contradicted by everyday experience, and attributing a population trend to chicken production is an unsupported ecological inference. Rated like the comparable egg claim C-EGG-01; certainty low because the topic is little studied.
- Kualitas sumber
Own words in several machine transcripts, plus archive paraphrase; evidence consists of caller anecdotes.
- Keteralihan ke wilayah lain
Universal claim.
- Pengecualian individual
Some people associate specific foods with poor sleep; food intolerance with gastrointestinal symptoms was associated with nightmares in a survey (I-EGG-13).
- Cakupan wilayah klaim
- umum (biologis/medis)
- Terakhir ditinjau
- 26 Oktober 2026 sementara
Bukti ilmiah secara rinci
Tidak didukung bukti berkualitas tinggi – Tidak ada bukti yang baik untuk klaim ini; hal ini saja tidak membuktikan bahwa klaim itu salah.
Pertanyaan penelitian: In children and adults, does eating chicken cause nightmares, panic attacks, hallucinations or other psychiatric symptoms, and did mass chicken production cause a rise in panic attacks over the last 20 years?
Pertanyaan penelitian secara rinci (PECO)
- Populasi
- Children and adults
- Intervensi atau paparan
- Chicken/poultry consumption; population trends in chicken production
- Pembanding
- Low/no chicken intake; earlier time periods
- Cakupan geografis
- universal biology
- Luaran
- panic attacks/anxiety disorders
- nightmares
- hallucinations/psychosis
- population prevalence trends
Hasil studi sebagaimana dilaporkan oleh para penulis. Penilaian kami menyusul di bawah.
Apa yang mendukung klaim ini?
Tidak ditemukan bukti berkualitas tinggi yang mendukung klaim ini.
Apa yang menentang klaim ini?
White meat was not linked to anxiety in Iranian adults
Kazemi S et al.. Front Nutr 2021 · PMID 34386515 · DOI 10.3389/fnut.2021.710555 Studi potong lintangabstrak diperiksabaru ditambahkanCross-sectional study of 3,362 Iranian adults on red and white meat intake and mental symptoms.
- Hasil sebenarnya
- White meat not associated with anxiety, depression or distress; in overweight/obese adults inverse associations (distress OR 0.64; 0.42-0.99).
- Kualitas metodologis
- low (cross-sectional)
- Relevansi
- indirect (white meat incl. fish; no panic or hallucination outcome)
- Keterbatasan
- Reverse causation; subgroup findings.
Meat eaters reported slightly less anxiety than people who avoid meat
Dobersek U et al.. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2023 · PMID 34612096 · DOI 10.1080/10408398.2021.1974336 Meta-analisisabstrak diperiksabaru ditambahkanMeta-analysis of 20 studies comparing meat eaters and abstainers.
- Hasil sebenarnya
- Meat eaters had lower anxiety (g = 0.17; 0.03-0.31) and depression (g = 0.216).
- Kualitas metodologis
- low to moderate (observational, heterogeneous)
- Relevansi
- very indirect (meat in general)
- Keterbatasan
- Not chicken-specific; no causal inference.
WHO: anxiety disorders are common and treatable
World Health Organization. WHO fact sheet 2026 Pedoman / pernyataan sikapteks lengkap diperiksabaru ditambahkanWHO fact sheet on anxiety disorders.
- Hasil sebenarnya
- Lists social, psychological and biological causes; no food named; highly effective treatments exist.
- Kualitas metodologis
- authoritative agency statement
- Relevansi
- indirect
- Keterbatasan
- Not a study.
Apa kata bukti secara keseluruhan?
Penilaian redaksi berdasarkan studi di atas – bukan hasil studi itu sendiri.
Posisi mana yang lebih didukung?
There is no evidence that chicken causes nightmares, panic attacks or hallucinations; the limited indirect data show no association of poultry/meat with anxiety.
Mengapa sebagian studi lebih berbobot
No study supports the claim. Indirect observational studies point in the opposite direction or show no association. The rise in anxiety disorders (I-CHK-107) is real but has many documented determinants and no data link it to chicken.
Apakah hubungan sebab-akibat sudah terbukti? Belum terbukti No mechanism, no exposure-outcome study, ecological reasoning only.
Ketidakpastian yang tersisa
No study has directly measured chicken intake and panic attacks or hallucinations; individual food-symptom associations cannot be excluded.
Kesimpulan yang dapat dibenarkan
The claim is unsupported and very likely false as a general statement; panic attacks and hallucinations need medical assessment.
Mengapa studi-studi tampak saling bertentangan?
The premise that panic/anxiety became more common is partly correct (I-CHK-107: age-standardised anxiety prevalence increased 1990-2023), but this is a population trend with many possible causes and does not conflict with the null individual-level data.
Apakah ini bergantung pada negara?
- Efek biologis umum
- Universal claim; no biological mechanism proposed.
- Kebiasaan makan
- Not relevant.
- Asal makanan
- Not relevant.
- Cemaran
- Not relevant.
- Kondisi produksi nasional
- Mass chicken production grew in parallel with many other social changes; ecological co-trends are not evidence.
- Aturan hukum
- Not relevant.
- Data pemantauan sebenarnya
- GBD prevalence data (I-CHK-107) show increases in all regions, with or without high chicken consumption.
Perbedaan antarwilayah yang mengubah kesimpulan tidak didukung oleh data yang kuat.
Pemeriksaan ulang statistik
- Conversion of Hedges g to approximate OR – Anxiety OR about 1.36 (1.06-1.75), depression about 1.48 (1.29-1.72) for abstainers vs consumers; small, opposite to the claim. dihitung ulang
Kepastian bukti secara keseluruhan (GRADE, disederhanakan)
- Luaran utama
- Panic attacks/anxiety, nightmares, hallucinations with chicken intake
- Tingkat awal
- rendah (studi observasional)
- Alasan penurunan tingkat
- indirectness: no study measures chicken and these outcomes
- imprecision
- Hasil
- rendah
Penilaian sederhana oleh satu penilai, mengikuti pendekatan GRADE; bukan panel GRADE formal. GRADE menilai kumpulan bukti untuk satu luaran, bukan studi individual.
Pedoman klinis dan pernyataan resmi yang diperiksa
- WHO: Anxiety disorders (fact sheet) (2026) · Publikasi asli
Anxiety disorders, including panic disorder, are common and highly treatable with psychological interventions and, in adults, SSRIs; diet is not listed as a cause.
Strategi penelusuran
Penelusuran literatur yang terdokumentasi untuk tinjauan ini (string pencarian dalam sintaksis asli basis data).
| Basis data | Tanggal | Penelusuran | Mencari | Hasil | Disertakan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Europe PMC | 26 Oktober 2026 | (chicken OR poultry) AND ("panic disorder" OR "panic attack" OR nightmare* OR hallucinat* OR psychosis) | bukti pendukung | 3571 | |
| Europe PMC | 26 Oktober 2026 | (TITLE:"poultry consumption" OR TITLE:"chicken consumption" OR TITLE:"poultry intake" OR TITLE:"white meat") AND (ABSTRACT:anxiety OR ABSTRACT:panic OR ABSTRACT:nightmare OR ABSTRACT:psychosis OR ABSTRACT:hallucination OR ABSTRACT:"mental health" OR ABSTRACT:depression) | bukti pendukung | 4 | |
| PubMed | 26 Oktober 2026 | (poultry[tiab] OR chicken[tiab]) AND (consumption[tiab] OR intake[tiab]) AND (panic[tiab] OR anxiety[tiab] OR nightmare*[tiab] OR hallucinat*[tiab] OR psychos*[tiab]) AND humans[mh] | kedua arah | 20 | |
| Europe PMC | 26 Oktober 2026 | TITLE:"meat" AND (TITLE:"mental health" OR TITLE:depression OR TITLE:anxiety) AND (systematic review OR meta-analysis in title/pub type) | bukti yang menentang | 6 | |
| Europe PMC | 26 Oktober 2026 | TITLE:"Global Burden of Disease" AND TITLE:"mental disorders" AND (TITLE:"1990" OR TITLE:"2019" OR TITLE:"2021") | bukti yang menentang | 39 | |
| WHO website | 26 Oktober 2026 | fact sheet: anxiety disorders | pedoman | 1 |
Pertanyaan terbuka
Whether specific individuals report sleep effects after heavy late meals (general meal timing) rather than chicken specifically.
Seberapa mendalam ini diperiksa?
7 studi terkait: 3 diperiksa dalam teks lengkap (2 di antaranya dengan penilaian risiko bias terstruktur), 4 berdasarkan abstrak, 0 hanya secara bibliografis. Belum ada penilaian formal oleh dua penilai independen dan belum ada tinjauan pakar manusia yang independen.
Tinjauan ilmiah terakhir: 26 Oktober 2026
Riwayat penilaian
- 25 Oktober 2026 · Fase 1 · Penilaian awal: Sebagian besar salah (rendah)
- 26 Oktober 2026 · Fase 4 (tinjauan bukti sistematis) · Diperiksa ulang dengan bukti yang diperluas; penilaian tidak berubah: Sebagian besar salah (rendah)
New evidence is indirect (white meat and meat in general show no harmful association; WHO lists no dietary cause). A FALSE verdict would require direct evidence; certainty stays low. The safety note is preserved and sharpened.
Sumber baru: I-CHK-105 I-CHK-106 I-CHK-107 I-CHK-140
Dalam bahasa sederhana
Dr. Elawady mengatakan bahwa ayam menyebabkan mimpi buruk, serangan panik, dan bahkan halusinasi pada anak-anak dan orang dewasa. Tidak ada penelitian yang mendukung hal ini. Dalam survei tentang makanan dan mimpi, orang-orang kebanyakan menyalahkan produk susu dan makanan manis, bukan ayam. Serangan panik dan halusinasi adalah kondisi medis nyata yang dapat diobati, sehingga sebaiknya diperiksa oleh dokter.
Studi tentang klaim ini
Studi yang mendukung klaim (0)
Tidak ada studi dalam kelompok ini.
Studi yang membantah atau membatasi klaim (5)
-
Which foods do people blame for bad dreams?
Nielsen T, Powell RA. Front Psychol 2015 · PMID 25741294 · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00047Studi potong lintangpemeriksaan silang independenteks lengkap, penilaian risiko bias terstrukturAbout one in six students thought food affected their dreams, mostly dairy.
Apakah studi ini mendukung klaim spesifik tersebut? Tidak · Kualitas metodologis: rendah · Tingkat kepastian bukti: lihat penilaian keseluruhan atas klaim
Publikasi asli · Rincian ilmiah
Penjelasan studi secara sederhana
- Apa yang ingin diketahui para peneliti?
How common is perceived food-dependent dreaming, and which foods are blamed?
- Bagaimana studi ini dilakukan?
Questionnaire survey of students
- Berapa banyak orang, hewan, atau sampel yang diteliti?
396 students; Students
- Apa yang sebenarnya ditemukan?
17.8% (68/382) thought food or late eating affected their dreams. Among the few who named foods (32 and 26 people), dairy was blamed most (44% for disturbing, 39% for bizarre dreams); sweets, spicy and starchy foods and meat followed; eggs and chicken were not mentioned.
- Seberapa besar efek yang teramati?
Associations
- Apa arti hasilnya dalam kehidupan sehari-hari?
Bad dreams relate more to poor sleep and eating habits.
- Apa keterbatasan studi ini?
Psychology students given course credit; self-reported beliefs; only about 30 people named foods; many untested-for-chance comparisons
- Apa yang dikatakannya tentang klaim spesifik Elawady?
Does not support egg/chicken claims.
- Apakah hasilnya berlaku untuk Jerman dan Eropa?
Moderate.
- Apa yang secara tegas tidak dapat disimpulkan dari studi ini?
Cannot show that any food causes bad dreams, and says nothing about snoring, sinusitis or headaches.
-
Food sensitivities and nightmares
Nielsen T et al.. Front Psychol 2025 · PMID 40667395 · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1544475Studi potong lintangpemeriksaan silang independenteks lengkap, penilaian risiko bias terstrukturOnly 5.5% of students thought food affected their dreams, mostly sweets and dairy; eggs were rarely named. People with food allergy or lactose intolerance reported more nightmares.
Apakah studi ini mendukung klaim spesifik tersebut? Tidak · Kualitas metodologis: rendah · Tingkat kepastian bukti: lihat penilaian keseluruhan atas klaim
Publikasi asli · Rincian ilmiah
Penjelasan studi secara sederhana
- Apa yang ingin diketahui para peneliti?
Why do people perceive that food affects dreams?
- Bagaimana studi ini dilakukan?
Online survey
- Berapa banyak orang, hewan, atau sampel yang diteliti?
1,082; Online participants
- Apa yang sebenarnya ditemukan?
5.5% (59/1,076) reported food affected dreams; sweets (30%) and dairy (21%) were blamed most, meat 8%, eggs 2% (3 mentions, none for disturbing dreams). Food allergy and lactose intolerance were linked with higher nightmare scores, the latter partly via gut symptoms.
- Seberapa besar efek yang teramati?
Associations; mediation
- Apa arti hasilnya dalam kehidupan sehari-hari?
Digestive discomfort may disturb sleep.
- Apa keterbatasan studi ini?
Students given course credit; everything self-reported; only 59 people perceived food effects; cross-sectional; many tests
- Apa yang dikatakannya tentang klaim spesifik Elawady?
Partly supports individual food-sensitivity effects on dreams; does not support a general effect of eggs or chicken (eggs rarely named, chicken not separated).
- Apakah hasilnya berlaku untuk Jerman dan Eropa?
Moderate.
- Apa yang secara tegas tidak dapat disimpulkan dari studi ini?
Cannot show causation, and says nothing about snoring, sinusitis or headaches.
-
White meat was not linked to anxiety in Iranian adults
Kazemi S et al.. Front Nutr 2021 · PMID 34386515 · DOI 10.3389/fnut.2021.710555Studi potong lintangpemeriksaan silang independenabstrak diperiksaIn 3,362 Iranian adults, eating more white meat was not linked to anxiety or depression.
White meat intake was not associated with anxiety or distress; no sign of harm.
Apakah studi ini mendukung klaim spesifik tersebut? Tidak · Kualitas metodologis: rendah · Tingkat kepastian bukti: lihat penilaian keseluruhan atas klaim
Publikasi asli · Rincian ilmiah
Penjelasan studi secara sederhana
- Apa yang ingin diketahui para peneliti?
Are red and white meat intakes associated with depression, anxiety and psychological distress?
- Bagaimana studi ini dilakukan?
Cross-sectional study with FFQ, HADS and GHQ
- Berapa banyak orang, hewan, atau sampel yang diteliti?
3,362
- Apa yang sebenarnya ditemukan?
White meat intake was not associated with mental disorders overall. In overweight/obese participants, high white meat intake was associated with lower odds of psychological distress (OR 0.64; 0.42-0.99) and depression (OR 0.68; 0.45-1.00). Red meat top quartile: depression OR 1.43 (1.09-1.89).
- Seberapa besar efek yang teramati?
White meat intake was not associated with mental disorders overall. In overweight/obese participants, high white meat intake was associated with lower odds of psychological distress (OR 0.64; 0.42-0.99) and depression (OR 0.68; 0.45-1.00). Red meat top quartile: depression OR 1.43 (1.09-1.89).
- Apa arti hasilnya dalam kehidupan sehari-hari?
No sign that poultry eaters have more anxiety.
- Apa keterbatasan studi ini?
Cross-sectional; reverse causation possible; White meat includes fish; Subgroup findings, multiple testing
- Apa yang dikatakannya tentang klaim spesifik Elawady?
Indirect contradiction; does not measure panic attacks, nightmares or hallucinations.
- Apakah hasilnya berlaku untuk Jerman dan Eropa?
Regional (Iran); limited transfer.
- Apa yang secara tegas tidak dapat disimpulkan dari studi ini?
Cannot prove absence of an effect; cross-sectional.
-
Meat eaters reported slightly less anxiety than people who avoid meat
Dobersek U et al.. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2023 · PMID 34612096 · DOI 10.1080/10408398.2021.1974336Meta-analisispemeriksaan silang independenabstrak diperiksaPooling 20 studies, meat eaters had slightly lower anxiety and depression than meat avoiders.
Meat eaters had slightly lower anxiety than abstainers; not chicken-specific.
Apakah studi ini mendukung klaim spesifik tersebut? Tidak · Kualitas metodologis: rendah · Tingkat kepastian bukti: lihat penilaian keseluruhan atas klaim
Publikasi asli · Rincian ilmiah
Penjelasan studi secara sederhana
- Apa yang ingin diketahui para peneliti?
Do meat consumers and meat abstainers differ in depression and anxiety?
- Bagaimana studi ini dilakukan?
Meta-analysis of 20 primary studies comparing meat consumers and abstainers
- Berapa banyak orang, hewan, atau sampel yang diteliti?
171,802 participants (157,778 meat consumers; 13,259 abstainers)
- Apa yang sebenarnya ditemukan?
Meat consumption associated with lower depression (Hedges g = 0.216; 0.14-0.30) and lower anxiety (g = 0.17; 0.03-0.31) vs abstention. Study quality explained 58% and 76% of heterogeneity; more rigorous studies showed more consistent results.
- Seberapa besar efek yang teramati?
Meat consumption associated with lower depression (Hedges g = 0.216; 0.14-0.30) and lower anxiety (g = 0.17; 0.03-0.31) vs abstention. Study quality explained 58% and 76% of heterogeneity; more rigorous studies showed more consistent results.
- Apa arti hasilnya dalam kehidupan sehari-hari?
No sign that eating meat makes people anxious; the link is weak and not causal.
- Apa keterbatasan studi ini?
Mostly cross-sectional; Not poultry-specific; Possible reverse causation (people with mental illness may change diet)
- Apa yang dikatakannya tentang klaim spesifik Elawady?
Very indirect evidence against the claim.
- Apakah hasilnya berlaku untuk Jerman dan Eropa?
Mostly Western populations.
- Apa yang secara tegas tidak dapat disimpulkan dari studi ini?
Cannot say that meat protects mental health.
-
WHO: anxiety disorders are common and treatable
World Health Organization. WHO fact sheet 2026Pedoman / pernyataan sikappemeriksaan silang independenteks lengkap diperiksaWHO names effective psychological and drug treatments and does not list any food as a cause.
WHO lists no food (including chicken) as a cause and names effective treatments.
Apakah studi ini mendukung klaim spesifik tersebut? Tidak · Kualitas metodologis: sedang · Tingkat kepastian bukti: lihat penilaian keseluruhan atas klaim
Publikasi asli · Rincian ilmiah
Penjelasan studi secara sederhana
- Apa yang ingin diketahui para peneliti?
What are anxiety disorders, their causes and treatments?
- Bagaimana studi ini dilakukan?
Agency fact sheet
- Berapa banyak orang, hewan, atau sampel yang diteliti?
not applicable
- Apa yang sebenarnya ditemukan?
Anxiety disorders affected 470 million people in 2023; panic disorder = 'panic attacks and fear of continued panic attacks'; 'There are highly effective treatments for anxiety disorders'; psychological interventions are essential treatments; SSRIs can be useful. Contributing factors listed: social, psychological and biological factors and adverse experiences; diet is not listed as a cause (only 'eat a healthy diet' as self-care).
- Seberapa besar efek yang teramati?
Anxiety disorders affected 470 million people in 2023; panic disorder = 'panic attacks and fear of continued panic attacks'; 'There are highly effective treatments for anxiety disorders'; psychological interventions are essential treatments; SSRIs can be useful. Contributing factors listed: social, psychological and biological factors and adverse experiences; diet is not listed as a cause (only 'eat a healthy diet' as self-care).
- Apa arti hasilnya dalam kehidupan sehari-hari?
Panic attacks should be assessed and treated; diet change is not a treatment.
- Apa keterbatasan studi ini?
Fact sheet, not a systematic review
- Apa yang dikatakannya tentang klaim spesifik Elawady?
Supports the safety note.
- Apakah hasilnya berlaku untuk Jerman dan Eropa?
Applies globally.
- Apa yang secara tegas tidak dapat disimpulkan dari studi ini?
Not a study of chicken.
Tidak ada studi dalam kelompok ini yang ditandai sebagai studi kunci.
Studi dengan hasil campuran atau tidak jelas (2)
-
Anxiety disorders became more common worldwide since 1990
GBD 2023 Mental Disorder Collaborators. Lancet 2026 · PMID 42167272 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00519-2Tinjauan sistematispemeriksaan silang independenabstrak diperiksaAge-standardised prevalence of anxiety disorders increased between 1990 and 2023.
Anxiety prevalence rose since 1990 (premise partly correct), but the data give no causal link to chicken.
Apakah studi ini mendukung klaim spesifik tersebut? Sebagian · Kualitas metodologis: sedang · Tingkat kepastian bukti: lihat penilaian keseluruhan atas klaim
Publikasi asli · Rincian ilmiah
Penjelasan studi secara sederhana
- Apa yang ingin diketahui para peneliti?
How did the prevalence and burden of mental disorders change from 1990 to 2023?
- Bagaimana studi ini dilakukan?
Systematic analysis and Bayesian meta-regression (GBD 2023)
- Berapa banyak orang, hewan, atau sampel yang diteliti?
204 countries
- Apa yang sebenarnya ditemukan?
1.17 billion prevalent cases in 2023; age-standardised prevalence of all mental disorders +24.2% (11.4-41.4) since 1990; notable increases in age-standardised prevalence for anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder and others. Anxiety disorders ranked 11th of 304 causes of DALYs.
- Seberapa besar efek yang teramati?
1.17 billion prevalent cases in 2023; age-standardised prevalence of all mental disorders +24.2% (11.4-41.4) since 1990; notable increases in age-standardised prevalence for anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder and others. Anxiety disorders ranked 11th of 304 causes of DALYs.
- Apa arti hasilnya dalam kehidupan sehari-hari?
The observation that anxiety is more common is partly right; the cause is not shown.
- Apa keterbatasan studi ini?
Modelled estimates, sparse data in many countries; No information on causes of trends; Erratum published (Lancet 2026;408:698)
- Apa yang dikatakannya tentang klaim spesifik Elawady?
Supports only the trend observation, not the attribution to chicken production.
- Apakah hasilnya berlaku untuk Jerman dan Eropa?
Includes European and North-African countries.
- Apa yang secara tegas tidak dapat disimpulkan dari studi ini?
Cannot attribute the trend to any food.
-
How much do we know about poultry and health?
Connolly G et al.. Adv Nutr 2022 · PMID 36351778 · DOI 10.1093/advances/nmac074Tinjauan sistematispemeriksaan silang independenabstrak diperiksaA map of 525 studies found little direct research on poultry itself and no randomised trials.
Mental-health outcomes appear only among 'other' topics; no evidence base for the claim.
Apakah studi ini mendukung klaim spesifik tersebut? Tidak jelas · Kualitas metodologis: sedang · Tingkat kepastian bukti: lihat penilaian keseluruhan atas klaim
Publikasi asli · Rincian ilmiah
Penjelasan studi secara sederhana
- Apa yang ingin diketahui para peneliti?
What research exists on poultry intake and human health?
- Bagaimana studi ini dilakukan?
Systematically searched scoping review (protocol on OSF)
- Berapa banyak orang, hewan, atau sampel yang diteliti?
525 of 13,141 articles
- Apa yang sebenarnya ditemukan?
525 articles: 212 cancer, 41 CVD, 52 CVD risk factors, 32 T2D, 33 T2D risk factors, 42 body weight, 181 other (incl. mental health). 366 observational, 64 experimental, 76 reviews. No RCT and only 1% of observational studies assessed processed poultry. 'A paucity of research exists to support poultry as health-promoting foods'.
- Seberapa besar efek yang teramati?
525 articles: 212 cancer, 41 CVD, 52 CVD risk factors, 32 T2D, 33 T2D risk factors, 42 body weight, 181 other (incl. mental health). 366 observational, 64 experimental, 76 reviews. No RCT and only 1% of observational studies assessed processed poultry. 'A paucity of research exists to support poultry as health-promoting foods'.
- Apa arti hasilnya dalam kehidupan sehari-hari?
Science has not studied chicken alone very much.
- Apa keterbatasan studi ini?
Scoping review: no effect estimates or quality rating; Funding not stated in abstract (PubMed: non-US government support)
- Apa yang dikatakannya tentang klaim spesifik Elawady?
Explains why certainty about chicken-specific effects is low.
- Apakah hasilnya berlaku untuk Jerman dan Eropa?
General.
- Apa yang secara tegas tidak dapat disimpulkan dari studi ini?
Gives no effect sizes.
Tidak ada studi dalam kelompok ini yang ditandai sebagai studi kunci.
Konteks wilayah
Jerman / UE
Not region-specific.
Mesir
Not region-specific.
- Antibiotic (veterinary drug) residues in poultry meat and eggs
- Antimicrobial use in food animals and antibiotic growth promoters
- Hormones in poultry, meat, milk and farmed fish
- Salmonella in laying hens, eggs and broiler chicken
- Drinking water quality
- Import controls and the meaning of RASFF notifications for Egyptian products
Apa yang berlaku di negara saya?
Penilaian ilmiah umum
Sebagian besar salah Tidak ada bukti bahwa ayam menyebabkan mimpi buruk, serangan panik, atau halusinasi.
Bidang keamanan pangan berikut relevan dengan pernyataan ini:
- Obat hewan dan antibiotik
- Hormon pemacu pertumbuhan
- Cemaran (logam berat, PFAS, PCB, dioksin, nitrat)
- Patogen (Salmonella, Campylobacter, dll.)
- Peternakan dan pakan
- Pengawasan, impor, penarikan produk, pelabelan
Unggas
Pilih negara untuk melihat informasi yang telah diperiksa untuk negara tersebut.
Batasan: aturan hukum menggambarkan apa yang diizinkan, bukan apa yang terkandung dalam setiap makanan. Data pengukuran berasal dari sampel dan hanya bermakna bersama rincian metodenya.
Negara tempat tinggal atau pembelian Bandingkan dengan negara lain
Referensi
- Dreams of the Rarebit Fiend: food and diet as instigators of bizarre and disturbing dreams.. Nielsen T, Powell RA. Front Psychol 2015 · PMID 25741294 · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00047
- More dreams of the rarebit fiend: food sensitivity and dietary correlates of sleep and dreaming.. Nielsen T et al.. Front Psychol 2025 · PMID 40667395 · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1544475
- Red and White Meat Intake in Relation to Mental Disorders in Iranian Adults.. Kazemi S et al.. Front Nutr 2021 · PMID 34386515 · DOI 10.3389/fnut.2021.710555
- Meat and mental health: A meta-analysis of meat consumption, depression, and anxiety.. Dobersek U et al.. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2023 · PMID 34612096 · DOI 10.1080/10408398.2021.1974336
- WHO fact sheet: Anxiety disorders (15 September 2026). World Health Organization. WHO fact sheet 2026
- Updated trends in the global prevalence and burden of mental disorders, 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.. GBD 2023 Mental Disorder Collaborators. Lancet 2026 · PMID 42167272 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00519-2
- Poultry Consumption and Human Health: How Much Is Really Known? A Systematically Searched Scoping Review and Research Perspective.. Connolly G et al.. Adv Nutr 2022 · PMID 36351778 · DOI 10.1093/advances/nmac074